Translation:
That good chap Robinous van Persieus in the season of 2008 was our best player.
by GunnGunn » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:08 pm
by golfinguy » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:16 pm
Popey wrote:golfinguy wrote:Its why I thought Chamack was not enough all along. We need a top top striker with RVP. Partner someone like that with him and we're beyond deadly. When RVP is out (inevitable it seems), we still have a top class striker.
I like what Chamack has done, but he's not the top class guy I wanted. Not with the frailties of RVP to deal with.
So, don't sell off RVP - he's quality.
wenger will not buy what you want! you will never see wenger buying a player like torres, villa or higuain.
by UFGN » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:47 pm
by Goose » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:15 pm
by Forest » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:15 pm
by UFGN » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:44 pm
by Forest » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:50 pm
by Goose » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:01 pm
UFGN wrote:Anyone who thinks wenger would sell rvp and not replace him and on the other hand thinks he is still the best man to be manager of our club is a disgrace. im sick of peoples attitudes toward him. think about what you are saying. You are admitting that he probably wouldmt replace a key player and suggesting that is just normal and not totally unacceptable. imagine the idea of red nose selling rooney and not replacing him. Wouldnt happen. And their fans wouldnt find it a laghing matter either.
by UFGN » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:19 pm
Goose wrote:UFGN wrote:Anyone who thinks wenger would sell rvp and not replace him and on the other hand thinks he is still the best man to be manager of our club is a disgrace. im sick of peoples attitudes toward him. think about what you are saying. You are admitting that he probably wouldmt replace a key player and suggesting that is just normal and not totally unacceptable. imagine the idea of red nose selling rooney and not replacing him. Wouldnt happen. And their fans wouldnt find it a laghing matter either.
Yeah, can you imagine Utd selling a player like Ronaldo, "the best player in the world" for a record £80 million fee and not replacing him?
Oh wit.......
by Forest » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:24 pm
UFGN wrote:Goose wrote:UFGN wrote:Anyone who thinks wenger would sell rvp and not replace him and on the other hand thinks he is still the best man to be manager of our club is a disgrace. im sick of peoples attitudes toward him. think about what you are saying. You are admitting that he probably wouldmt replace a key player and suggesting that is just normal and not totally unacceptable. imagine the idea of red nose selling rooney and not replacing him. Wouldnt happen. And their fans wouldnt find it a laghing matter either.
Yeah, can you imagine Utd selling a player like Ronaldo, "the best player in the world" for a record £80 million fee and not replacing him?
Oh wit.......
Firstly, Ronaldo is simply not a replacable player,like for like. Rvp most deffinately is.
Secondly, red nose thought he had replaced him as far as possible with valencia. Error of judgement on his part imo but valencia could still turn out to be good for them
by CynicalGooner » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:29 pm
gunner2018 wrote:UFGN wrote:Goose wrote:UFGN wrote:Anyone who thinks wenger would sell rvp and not replace him and on the other hand thinks he is still the best man to be manager of our club is a disgrace. im sick of peoples attitudes toward him. think about what you are saying. You are admitting that he probably wouldmt replace a key player and suggesting that is just normal and not totally unacceptable. imagine the idea of red nose selling rooney and not replacing him. Wouldnt happen. And their fans wouldnt find it a laghing matter either.
Yeah, can you imagine Utd selling a player like Ronaldo, "the best player in the world" for a record £80 million fee and not replacing him?
Oh wit.......
Firstly, Ronaldo is simply not a replacable player,like for like. Rvp most deffinately is.
Secondly, red nose thought he had replaced him as far as possible with valencia. Error of judgement on his part imo but valencia could still turn out to be good for them
hes about a third of Ronaldo, plenty more players far better.
by Fabrestuta » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:31 pm
by Goose » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:32 pm
gunner2018 wrote:UFGN wrote:Goose wrote:UFGN wrote:Anyone who thinks wenger would sell rvp and not replace him and on the other hand thinks he is still the best man to be manager of our club is a disgrace. im sick of peoples attitudes toward him. think about what you are saying. You are admitting that he probably wouldmt replace a key player and suggesting that is just normal and not totally unacceptable. imagine the idea of red nose selling rooney and not replacing him. Wouldnt happen. And their fans wouldnt find it a laghing matter either.
Yeah, can you imagine Utd selling a player like Ronaldo, "the best player in the world" for a record £80 million fee and not replacing him?
Oh wit.......
Firstly, Ronaldo is simply not a replacable player,like for like. Rvp most deffinately is.
Secondly, red nose thought he had replaced him as far as possible with valencia. Error of judgement on his part imo but valencia could still turn out to be good for them
hes about a third of Ronaldo, plenty more players far better.
by Fabrestuta » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:34 pm