Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Talk about the FIFA World Cup 2010 in South Africa

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby dunkdafunk » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:53 am

why can there just be a siren which sounds when the whole of the ball crosses the line?
This would save the problem of interrupting the game.

Might be annoying during warm up, or the odd time when someone is offside and still shoots.
in wenger we trust
User avatar
dunkdafunk
Ian Wright
Ian Wright
 
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:03 pm

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Briggsy » Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:16 am

dunkdafunk wrote:why can there just be a siren which sounds when the whole of the ball crosses the line?
This would save the problem of interrupting the game.

Might be annoying during warm up, or the odd time when someone is offside and still shoots.

this is used in hockey but I see faults with that what happens if a player crosses the line?
then your going to say put a microchip in the ball, the ball gets kicked and the micro chip will get damaged
Image
User avatar
Briggsy
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Walthamstow by way of Hackney

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Q8 Gooner » Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:56 am

mmm.. It took ze Germans 44 years to even things out.. So WC 2030 England will knock Argentina out of the world cup with a "hand of god" goal..!!
RED ARMY
User avatar
Q8 Gooner
David Rocastle
David Rocastle
 
Posts: 2008
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Kuwait

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Yorkyblue » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:00 am

Might as well compare the goals. Both were clearly over the line too. ;)
Image
User avatar
Yorkyblue
Arsène Wenger
Arsène Wenger
 
Posts: 19428
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:52 pm

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Yorkyblue » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:01 am

Briggsy wrote:
dunkdafunk wrote:why can there just be a siren which sounds when the whole of the ball crosses the line?
This would save the problem of interrupting the game.

Might be annoying during warm up, or the odd time when someone is offside and still shoots.

this is used in hockey but I see faults with that what happens if a player crosses the line?
then your going to say put a microchip in the ball, the ball gets kicked and the micro chip will get damaged


I thought they were going to use extra linesmen this WC to stand behind the goal or there abouts? I'm sure they trialled it somewhere recently.
Image
User avatar
Yorkyblue
Arsène Wenger
Arsène Wenger
 
Posts: 19428
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:52 pm

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Q8 Gooner » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:06 am

Yorkyblue wrote:Might as well compare the goals. Both were clearly over the line too. ;)

yep.. I think they both were..
RED ARMY
User avatar
Q8 Gooner
David Rocastle
David Rocastle
 
Posts: 2008
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Kuwait

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby gooneritis » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:06 am

lol at the sweaties, paddys and other bitter fans harping on about "justice" for 66' LOL.

it's not even that similar, england went on to score again against german in 66' and replays and modern technology suggests it probably did cross the line anyway so how can it be 'justice'? even if the 66' goal was disallowed we still scored again, germany didn't, it wasn't as though the krouts had had a goal disallowed to prevent them equalising thus changing the course of the game just as it did last night.

for the record i think we'd still have gotten beat yesterday and i refuse to defend a terrible team who were outclassed but...justice for 66'? lol what a load of bitter wankness.
Last edited by gooneritis on Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
User avatar
gooneritis
Tony Adams
Tony Adams
 
Posts: 4102
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:14 am

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby gooneritis » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:07 am

dunkdafunk wrote:why can there just be a siren which sounds when the whole of the ball crosses the line?
This would save the problem of interrupting the game.

Might be annoying during warm up, or the odd time when someone is offside and still shoots.


i don't think a tennis style siren would work at all.
it's far easier to simply have a 4th official watching the replay and within 30 seconds can indicate the correct decision via microphone.
ImageImage
User avatar
gooneritis
Tony Adams
Tony Adams
 
Posts: 4102
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:14 am

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Fabrestuta » Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:24 pm

gooneritis wrote:lol at the sweaties, paddys and other bitter fans harping on about "justice" for 66' LOL.

it's not even that similar, england went on to score again against german in 66' and replays and modern technology suggests it probably did cross the line anyway so how can it be 'justice'? even if the 66' goal was disallowed we still scored again, germany didn't, it wasn't as though the krouts had had a goal disallowed to prevent them equalising thus changing the course of the game just as it did last night.

for the record i think we'd still have gotten beat yesterday and i refuse to defend a terrible team who were outclassed but...justice for 66'? lol what a load of bitter wankness.


Do you have an on/off switch?

Is there anything that doesn't get you going? I am not the slightest bit bitter, its called banter. If it was Ireland, Scotland or Wales you'd likely be taking part in the slagging.

Take a chill pill, get a cup of coffee count to 10 and stop being a t**t.
User avatar
Fabrestuta
Rest in Peace
Rest in Peace
 
Posts: 18570
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:12 pm

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Briggsy » Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:30 pm

its true its Karma end of its like Ireland got knocked out because of a injustice of a bad refereeing decision much the same way as Ireland scored a the most dubious penalty against georgia
Image
User avatar
Briggsy
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Walthamstow by way of Hackney

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Fabrestuta » Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:35 pm

Briggsy wrote:its true its Karma end of its like Ireland got knocked out because of a injustice of a bad refereeing decision much the same way as Ireland scored a the most dubious penalty against georgia


True we did get a very dodgy penalty so maybe it was karma with the hand ball, and again maybe it was karma that France went to the WC and were a laughing stock.

Shit happens. I am quite sure the Germans will say it was karma that Fat Franks goal wasn't given. Unfortunately Sepp Blathering idiot probably doesn't give a damn and it still wont sway his decision not to implement some type of goal line technology.
User avatar
Fabrestuta
Rest in Peace
Rest in Peace
 
Posts: 18570
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:12 pm

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Briggsy » Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:39 pm

I think it is time to call in the video evidence why its squits lol
Image
User avatar
Briggsy
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Walthamstow by way of Hackney

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby freddybhoy » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:11 pm

gooneritis wrote:lol at the sweaties, paddys and other bitter fans harping on about "justice" for 66' LOL.

it's not even that similar, england went on to score again against german in 66' and replays and modern technology suggests it probably did cross the line anyway so how can it be 'justice'? even if the 66' goal was disallowed we still scored again, germany didn't, it wasn't as though the krouts had had a goal disallowed to prevent them equalising thus changing the course of the game just as it did last night.

for the record i think we'd still have gotten beat yesterday and i refuse to defend a terrible team who were outclassed but...justice for 66'? lol what a load of bitter wankness.
Take the lemon out your arse mate! It's a wind up. Nothing more, nothing less. As for us "sweaties" being "bitter", read your post back again and tell me who's bitter? We've known since time began that we'll amount to very little in the grand scheme of all things football, bar the occassional brush with glory. However, we had our "delusions of grandeur" moment in Argentina in 1978 :crybaby: , much to everyone's amusement south of Hadrians :rofll: . England fall into that trap every four years, much to OUR amusement. It's called sporting rivalry and we'll carry on giving as good as we get! You'll no doubt get plenty more opportunities to laugh at our expense. And what's more, I'll be here to face the music! :)
ONE VOICE, ONE LOVE, ONE FAITH, ONE CELTIC
User avatar
freddybhoy
Nigel Winterburn
Nigel Winterburn
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:23 pm
Location: Edinburgh ya bass!

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Popey » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:23 pm

Fifa and Uefa = joke!
Image

"Flamini played in more CL finals and won more trophies in England than anyone at Spurs"

madJens
bacary-sol-cashley
vieira-cesc
freddie-alexis-pires
dennis-thierry
User avatar
Popey
Bertie Mee
Bertie Mee
 
Posts: 8218
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:18 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Evidence suggests the whole ball wasn't over!

Postby Fabrestuta » Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:37 am

freddybhoy wrote:
gooneritis wrote:lol at the sweaties, paddys and other bitter fans harping on about "justice" for 66' LOL.

it's not even that similar, england went on to score again against german in 66' and replays and modern technology suggests it probably did cross the line anyway so how can it be 'justice'? even if the 66' goal was disallowed we still scored again, germany didn't, it wasn't as though the krouts had had a goal disallowed to prevent them equalising thus changing the course of the game just as it did last night.

for the record i think we'd still have gotten beat yesterday and i refuse to defend a terrible team who were outclassed but...justice for 66'? lol what a load of bitter wankness.
Take the lemon out your arse mate! It's a wind up. Nothing more, nothing less. As for us "sweaties" being "bitter", read your post back again and tell me who's bitter? We've known since time began that we'll amount to very little in the grand scheme of all things football, bar the occassional brush with glory. However, we had our "delusions of grandeur" moment in Argentina in 1978 :crybaby: , much to everyone's amusement south of Hadrians :rofll: . England fall into that trap every four years, much to OUR amusement. It's called sporting rivalry and we'll carry on giving as good as we get! You'll no doubt get plenty more opportunities to laugh at our expense. And what's more, I'll be here to face the music! :)


Post of the month. Our first world cup was 1990, we take anything we can get.
User avatar
Fabrestuta
Rest in Peace
Rest in Peace
 
Posts: 18570
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:12 pm

PreviousNext

Return to FIFA World Cup 2010

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests