Sherwood is an absolute idiot but he was right when he said that we need someone like Ozil. It's not nuclear physics, lads. We need a creative midfielder desperately.
When we signed Ceballos last season, I did tell you guys that Dani was a CM not a CAM.
Zenith wrote:Angelito wrote:There's a serious breakdown in the relationship between Ozil and the club. He was left to hang out dry when he dared to speak against the treatments of Uyghurs.
Arsenal commented that the club do not get involved in political issues. Then, during the BLM activism, the club didn't have an issue demonstrating its support.
So, which one is it?
Football clubs tend to support whichever cause that plays the same tune as that of the majority of the clubs' followers. In Arsenal's case, the club's following from China is thousands of times bigger than that from the Uyghur minority.
It's not an Arsenal-exclusive issue but one that is widespread across the world of football: from each big federation to every major club that has a major brand to protect.
It's sad, disgusting even, and—from a moral/ethical point of view—football is very two-faced in terms of the unity and division it creates.
Ultimately it all boils down to moolah.
Absolutely.
It's all about the money. It's also about the backlash from segments of the population. There's no ramifications in speaking for issues predominantly plaguing the Western world. But when it comes to issues in China, they will remain numb because China is highly sensitive and won't sit back quietly if an organization or a country speaks against its actions.
Morality doesn't exist in the corporate or political world. That's why I find the whole liberals/left vs conservatives/right argument hilarious. It's not about issues. It's about convenience and ultimately, what benefits an organization/individual.
Everything is about capital.