Callum wrote:I love how DG and a thousand other Brexiteers suddenly know more about the legality of the situation than literally the highest court of law in the country
The f***ing mental gymnastics to try and counter ANYTHING that delays the Brexit train is stunning
STFU Callum, how many times can you be wrong in one short post, its shameful.
Firstly I'm not a Brexiteer you muppet, secondly if you were actually following this conversation we're debating the lack of written rules on what seems to be an important area of Parliament, something which even Adolf Hitler had to get an agreement from the President and Gov't to suspend its function, apparently 1930's Germany in tatters had better written rules than we do.
Lastly I don't particularly want Brexit, not in its current form at the very least.
Typical Far Left Campus reactionary, anyone who questions anything is the enemy right? bore off.
My suggestion of these rules being apparent would of mean't Parliament would never of been suspended in the first place!! but you carry on my little lamb.
UFGN wrote:I think you misunderstand the function of the supreme court. Every single ruling they make is as a result of uncertainties in the law
If a law is clear or if there is clear case law, there are no grounds for appeal in the first place
The supreme court have simply done their job.
But its how they presented it by saying "Its illegal" no its not, you've literally just declared it is from your own new ruling, but again my biggest issue is that this rule should be written in the first place.
How many times have we been to Supreme Court over this fkin Brexit, its scandalous, our democracy is 400 yrs old ffs we didn't just write the rules in the last 50 years.