theHotHead wrote:Dejan wrote:theHotHead wrote:So, lets look at David Silva and Eden Hazard.
Silva
Goals/assists v top 6 - 33. So 23% of goals
Goals/assists v rest - 111. So 77% of goals
Hazard
Goals/assists v top 6 - 27. So 20% of goals
Goals assists v rest - 107. So 80% of goals
Ozil
Goals/assists v top 6 - 16. So 19% of goals
Goals/assists v rest - 70. So 81% of goals
Now consider, Ozil has been playing for a team that doesn't challenge for league titles and a team that typically has less squad quality than both Chelsea and Man City. A reminder, 26% of games are against top 6 teams, 74% are against the rest.
Another argument napalmed !
Percentage of assists within your own total assists isnt a very good measure to compare them is it. Should of compared these players with assists/goals per 90(against top 6). Far more accurate.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk
Huh ?? What could be more accurate than totaling the number of goals and assists and working out how many were against top teams and how many were not ? No need to over complicate this. 100% of goals/assists, how many were against the top 6 ? Does it match proportionally the number of games vs the top 6. Is Ozil a flat track bully? Not really. If he is then so is Hazard and Silva isn't far off either.
Because your stat does not take into account how many matches he played against top 6.
For example if he played once against top 6 and scored 2 and played 38 times against other teams outside top 6 and scored 76 then using your stat would make him look like a flattrack bully meanwhile his scoring ratio is the same between top6 and non top 6.
Using assist ratio per match of 90minutes against for both would give a better comparison.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk