firfi wrote:theHotHead wrote:firfi wrote:Santi wrote:Not really any different if he goes on loan or permanently, the opportunities for him to start don’t change. Ramsdale also will have zero say in whether it’s loan or permanent given his position, if he rejects a loan he’s sat in our bench all season wasting his career.
I’m not saying the fee is a surprise but it’s disappointing and I’d rather he’d gone to saints on loan and we try to shift him permanently next summer.
Yea ,but its very difficult to do loans on goalkeepers in the PL honestly very few have been done in the past .Dean Henderson only comes to mind.
We have to be honest here we overpaid quite abit for him when we got him from championship club for 30mil for gk.
Looooool
David Raya says hi
But its difficult to do loans in the Prem lol
That wasnt loan it was buyout with 1 season delay.
It wasn't option.It was obligation to buy which is basically buying the player with 1 season delay.
He had that in the contract when we got him if he plays more than 50% of the games in the season we're obligated to sign him for a set fee.
It was a loan and as with a lot of loans there was an obligation to buy. It was a loan whether you want to admit it or not