by Santi » Sat Aug 14, 2021 8:25 pm
by VCC » Sun Aug 15, 2021 1:28 am
by EliteKiller » Sun Aug 15, 2021 1:39 am
by Arsenal Tone » Sun Aug 15, 2021 5:27 am
The choice is Willock or one of Odegaard/Maddison.EliteKiller wrote:Exactly the sort of deal we should be looking for - 20m for a 21 year old with over 50 games in the EPL - worst case you can sell in 3 years and hope to get your money back, best case he develops into a decent >50m player ...
Just don't see how this makes sense for us, are we really that skint?
by EliteKiller » Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:36 am
Tony Adams wrote:The choice is Willock or one of Odegaard/Maddison.EliteKiller wrote:Exactly the sort of deal we should be looking for - 20m for a 21 year old with over 50 games in the EPL - worst case you can sell in 3 years and hope to get your money back, best case he develops into a decent >50m player ...
Just don't see how this makes sense for us, are we really that skint?
by Arsenal Tone » Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:38 am
EliteKiller wrote:Tony Adams wrote:The choice is Willock or one of Odegaard/Maddison.EliteKiller wrote:Exactly the sort of deal we should be looking for - 20m for a 21 year old with over 50 games in the EPL - worst case you can sell in 3 years and hope to get your money back, best case he develops into a decent >50m player ...
Just don't see how this makes sense for us, are we really that skint?
OK Maddison for 20m please
by Highbury Hillbilly » Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:46 pm
EliteKiller wrote:Tony Adams wrote:The choice is Willock or one of Odegaard/Maddison.EliteKiller wrote:Exactly the sort of deal we should be looking for - 20m for a 21 year old with over 50 games in the EPL - worst case you can sell in 3 years and hope to get your money back, best case he develops into a decent >50m player ...
Just don't see how this makes sense for us, are we really that skint?
OK Maddison for 20m please
by Santi » Sat Oct 23, 2021 6:55 pm
by KG3 » Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:57 am
Santi wrote:Anyone who still thinks this was a bad sale?
by Alexis » Tue Dec 28, 2021 10:54 pm
KG3 wrote:Santi wrote:Anyone who still thinks this was a bad sale?
Never did but we wasted the money on odeegard though who cost 10M more than we made on willock so are we really winners here
They’re both crap but you know if you look at it from a financial point of view we wasted 10M
by jayramfootball » Wed Dec 29, 2021 12:40 am
by Rockape » Sun Feb 27, 2022 8:11 am
jayramfootball wrote:We over charged Newcastle by £24,999,999 for Willock.
£1 would have been a fair deal.
He’s crap.
by jayramfootball » Sun Feb 27, 2022 8:20 am
Rockape wrote:jayramfootball wrote:We over charged Newcastle by £24,999,999 for Willock.
£1 would have been a fair deal.
He’s crap.
Utter bollocks…..played well again yesterday and took his goal well.