by Zenith » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:06 pm
by Santi » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:27 pm
Zenith wrote:Just got home and saw the results...
What happened to Liverpool?
by Pudpop » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:19 pm
by elkanofan » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:49 pm
by EliteKiller » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:13 pm
by Santi » Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:41 am
EliteKiller wrote:Several teams made 9/10 changes .... Spuds, Utd, Dippers, City, Chelski .... Dipper's reserves looked shite the other four cruised through ... we made four changes and seriously struggled .... that says a lot about squad strength ...
When you look at the run in the squad will be vital ... 4 from 6 ... perhaps we should be worried ...
by Pudpop » Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:46 am
by EliteKiller » Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:50 am
Mesüt wrote:EliteKiller wrote:Several teams made 9/10 changes .... Spuds, Utd, Dippers, City, Chelski .... Dipper's reserves looked shite the other four cruised through ... we made four changes and seriously struggled .... that says a lot about squad strength ...
When you look at the run in the squad will be vital ... 4 from 6 ... perhaps we should be worried ...
United still had basically a full strength team out and Reading fell apart cos United scored early. Spuds struggled for 70 mins against shitty Villa until Davies randomly popped up as a striker. Chelsea had just a couple of kids off a full team and played against a league 1 team. City had a full team out but smashed West Ham with a good performance.
Don't try and make out something worse for us than it was, yes we struggled but so did Liverpool and Spurs. The other 3 had strong teams out too and won comfortably, so what.
by Santi » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:06 am
by EliteKiller » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:51 am
Mesüt wrote:What's that got to do with anything? You said Spurs cruised through, they didn't. United cruised because they had 7 players out there that are either first team or first subs, they got an early goal which made it piss easy. Chelsea had At least 5 of the same and Man City had their full fit first XI bar Bravo.