Manchester City

[Santi]

Who cares whether it was onside or offside. Their first goal should not have counted so its justice anyway.

Liverpool deserved winner. Lol at thinking otherwise when the score is 5-1 aggregated.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Not the point. I had bets on Liverpool and wanted them to go through but it changed the game and I think City would've overturned it, we'll never know.

If they did overturn it after a shocking first leg defeat then you'd have to say they deserved it instead

[Dejan]

they were never going to overturn it as liverpool always was going to score. Cities defence was wank

anyway back to the arsenal guys

[Va-Va-Voom]

How can he be level? If Jesus touches that ball then Sane is 100% offside. Otherwise he's not.

He looked level with Chamberlain.

[Ach]

Who cares whether it was onside or offside. Their first goal should not have counted so its justice anyway.

Liverpool deserved winner. Lol at thinking otherwise when the score is 5-1 aggregated.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Exactly.

[SuperJackyWilshere]

Not a single City player touches the ball after that so that is when he should be deemed on or offside.


Goodnight.

How can the ref/linesman be expected to see and remember the position of all the players at this moment?

It's not possible unless you have replays.

Not their fault.

Lol who put the flag up and who blew the whistle?

That's my point.

They're judging the offside from the moment of the pic you posted, not when KDB played the ball.

Fair enough. Just to confirm. Sane was onside?

He looks just about level, but you can see why he might've been flagged.

When it's 50/50 like that the call can go either way; just depends on the linesman.

Three knowledgable guys that know their stuff.

Ach lol.

[SuperJackyWilshere]

Who cares whether it was onside or offside. Their first goal should not have counted so its justice anyway.

Liverpool deserved winner. Lol at thinking otherwise when the score is 5-1 aggregated.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Wait. You think little old Sterlings nudge on VVD was a foul?

Brilliant.

[Ach]

Dear god. See what I mean about afc10 knowledge.

[Santi]

How can he be level? If Jesus touches that ball then Sane is 100% offside. Otherwise he's not.

He looked level with Chamberlain.

Has to be two opposition players though, cos the keeper is ahead of them.

[Dejan]

Who cares whether it was onside or offside. Their first goal should not have counted so its justice anyway.

Liverpool deserved winner. Lol at thinking otherwise when the score is 5-1 aggregated.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Wait. You think little old Sterlings nudge on VVD was a foul?

Brilliant.

try harder AFC10, Its been a rough week for you

[Ach]

Who cares whether it was onside or offside. Their first goal should not have counted so its justice anyway.

Liverpool deserved winner. Lol at thinking otherwise when the score is 5-1 aggregated.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Wait. You think little old Sterlings nudge on VVD was a foul?

Brilliant.

try harder AFC10, Its been a rough week for you

Destroyed.

[Va-Va-Voom]

How can he be level? If Jesus touches that ball then Sane is 100% offside. Otherwise he's not.

He looked level with Chamberlain.

Has to be two opposition players though, cos the keeper is ahead of them.

So why has SuperJack posted that pic?

I can see why they got the decision wrong, the rule is too damn convoluted.

Streamline that shit and get replays.

[Santi]

The pic just shows it coming from Milner. Even if it was 1 player, Sane's foot is doing a Laca v Stoke.

The only argument against the ref/lino is the lack of City player touching the ball since KDB. They just got it completely wrong.

Anyway more worried about our own f***ing team going out of Europe now!!

[Ach]

How can he be level? If Jesus touches that ball then Sane is 100% offside. Otherwise he's not.

He looked level with Chamberlain.

Has to be two opposition players though, cos the keeper is ahead of them.

So why has SuperJack posted that pic?

I can see why they got the decision wrong, the rule is too damn convoluted.

Streamline that shit and get replays.

Cos he thinks he's not offside based on that pic. At least Mesut god bless his little soul might have a point as laughable as it is seeing as 47 things happened after that but afc10 has no clue of the rules.

[SuperJackyWilshere]

The pic just shows it coming from Milner. Even if it was 1 player, Sane's foot is doing a Laca v Stoke.

The only argument against the ref/lino is the lack of City player touching the ball since KDB. They just got it completely wrong.

Anyway more worried about our own f***ing team going out of Europe now!!

This.

That was also the other debate about it being offside which was quite quickly proven wrong even though Ach still thinks it is. Lol.

Matter of the fact is it should never of been ruled out. Perfectly fine goal which cost City in the end.

[SuperJackyWilshere]

He's done it!

What a day.

Best manager in the league by a mile. A big congratulations to Pep.