Page 1 of 386
Super Jacky Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:16 amby sweggeh
Quite a few rumours today that he is City's main transfer target for the summer. So first Kolo, Adebayor and Clichy, and now they want Walcott and Wilshere as well. I would be sickened if these deals actually went through.
Sunday Times and Metro reporting.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:30 amby Big17
Not happening. Nothing stories.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:32 amby Nuggets
Wouldn't be too unhappy if true.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:40 amby jules_w
Can't see Jack moving , Theo on the other hand...
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:46 amby Dubs4Sam
Nuggets wrote:Wouldn't be too unhappy if true.
Me three.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:15 pmby Tarquinius
Dubs4Sam wrote:Nuggets wrote:Wouldn't be too unhappy if true.
Me three.
Me 4.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:21 pmby Zedie
sweggeh wrote:Quite a few rumours today that he is City's main transfer target for the summer. So first Kolo, Adebayor and Clichy, and now they want Walcott and Wilshere as well. I would be sickened if these deals actually went through.
Sunday Times and Metro reporting.
You'll be one of a few that won't be baffled when he gets an injury free run and starts looking like the real deal again.
Prepare yourself for a wave of outrage from the people that wanted rid when that does happen.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:25 pmby Dubs4Sam
^ No Arsenal to City Transfer has worked out so I am not to worried about this. Wilshere is good to could be great but I wouldnt lose any sleep over him leaving the club.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:33 pmby Tarquinius
Even if he does well there and stays fit, it's win-win for all concerned.
Good for City as they get value for money
Good for Arsenal as he'd be off the wage bill and treatment table, allowing the position to be upgraded
Finally, good for Wilshere as he gets a long injury-free run, something he could never manage at Arsenal.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:15 pmby jmiles10
We need to add not sell.
Flamini, arteta, Campbell, poldi, sanago can go, but everyone can be kept.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:17 pmby Dubs4Sam
None of those except for maybe young Arteta are CM's. You should be always looking to upgrade and he has cleary stagnated at his current level which is not quite good enough for what we need. I'm not a Wilshere hater but I dont as a non english man see the hype either.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:25 pmby Captain
Only way this happens is if his Vermaelened, can't see where he fits into their team anyway. Thought City usually went for big guys in the middle.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:31 pmby Tarquinius
Captain wrote:Only way this happens is if his Vermaelened, can't see where he fits into their team anyway. Thought City usually went for big guys in the middle.
They won't have enough homegrown players in their squad with Milner, Lampard, Sinclair and Richards gone, and their plans to upgrade Clichy with either Kurzawa or Digne. I reckon they'll be looking to buy at least 3 homegrown squad players this summer.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:38 pmby UFGN
He is a useful part of the squad and there is no point in selling him.
Re: Jack Wilshere
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:44 pmby JordanTheGunner
UFGN wrote:He is a useful part of the squad and there is no point in selling him.
Too early to shape his career, he is a very good squad player, if we sell him we'd have to buy and he has the potential to be top class, no brainer for me. Walcott even more.