The Let's All Vent About Man-U thread

[Zedie]

"So when you speak about responsibilities to win the Premier League, Tottenham doesn’t have that responsibility because they are not the club with the same history as us? The Arsenal doesn’t have a responsibility to win it? Chelsea doesn’t have a responsibility to win it?"

"Manchester City buy full-backs for the price of strikers!"

"So when you speak about big football clubs, you are speaking about the history of the club."

When put to him that United have spent £300million under him, he added: "It’s not enough."

Lol in typical Mourinho fashion. The mug has no right to mention Arsenal there because we havent spent close to 300m in the last two seasons. He also mustve forgotten that the top 2 most expensive players in the EPL are Pogba and Lukaku, both bought with him at the helm.

What a f***ing c***. He just can't take responsibility for anything. "300m is not enough" lol.

This is why Pep must be Invincible, to break Mourinho

He's already broken judging by those excuses

[Arsenal Tone]

He sounds more and more like Arsene every day. He’s losing his ‘edge’ imo.

[GoonerAlexandre]

He sounds more and more like Arsene every day. He’s losing his ‘edge’ imo.

Weird how when he's finally outspent like Wenger was, he's resorting to the same excuses. More Arsene like than most people would admit, both wedded to their philosophy.

[Arsenal~Fanatic]

Spend £300m and moan that they haven't spent enough. United fans are massively ticked off by his recent statement. They are saying what majority of the footballing world already knew which is that Jose is a checkbook manager especially in recent times. The first thing he blames every time after an unfavorable result is the lack of funding.

Mourinho is caught between the direct style he prefers and the dynamic pass and move type of style contemporary football demands. Mourinho hasn't regressed, he is just where he was but the football world has definitely moved on big time where archaic ungainly lump it hoof-ball football is not acceptable for top clubs. One thing Mourinho did in his earlier avatar was get results but once the results deserted him he is exposed as a manager who has massive limitations as far as playing a free flowing offensive style of football, irrespective of the quality of the players at his disposal.

[Sims]

It’s alrigjt lads he’s finally gone from English football in 6 months time when he gets sacked

[Schlandi]

Pep won the league with Munich by not spending money

Took over triple winning team in their prime.
Spent
62m€ (13/14)
53.4m€ + Lewandowski "for free"
89m€

You should be temporary banned for regulary spreading fake news..

[GoonerAlexandre]

Pep won the league with Munich by not spending money

Took over triple winning team in their prime.
Spent
62m€ (13/14)
53.4m€ + Lewandowski "for free"
89m€

You should be temporary banned for regulary spreading fake news..

That's not a lot of money. Clubs regularly spend more. United have spent 600 million over that time.

[Schlandi]

So after spending the most money on new players Slavery City manager Pep Cuntiola wants to buy new players in the winter and nobody blinked with an eye.
Mou wants new players and GW goes berserk.. also missing some relevant parts about prices for big historical clubs nice agenda quoting..

#DoubleStandards

From DailyMail.co.uk

Pep
Total: £403.8m

Mou
Total: £286m

[GoonerAlexandre]

Schland with the biased stats again. Most people agree the difference is at most 60 million, not 120 million

[Schlandi]

Pep won the league with Munich by not spending money

Took over triple winning team in their prime.
Spent
62m€ (13/14)
53.4m€ + Lewandowski "for free"
89m€

You should be temporary banned for regulary spreading fake news..

That's not a lot of money. Clubs regularly spend more. United have spent 600 million over that time.

Nobody cares what United spent in the same time when you talk about winning the German League..
Already had the best team in the league still spent the most money in two of three of his Bundesliga seasons the only season he was topped by Dortmund was when Bayern got Lewa "on a free" Overall no club comes close to what Bayern spent in these three seasons.

#Fraudiola
#CheckbookManager

[Schlandi]

Schland with the biased stats again. Most people agree the difference is at most 60 million, not 120 million

Who agrees about that the shit troll you are?
It's from DailyMail like I wrote you can google it..

[GoonerAlexandre]

Going with TransferMarkt, Schland's previous source on this

Man City
249.3 million in- 2017/18
213 million in- 2016/17
462.3 million in

Man Utd
164.4 million in- 2017/18
185 million in - 2016/17
349.4 million in

Out goings though:
Man City
94.35 million out- 2017/18
35.35 million out- 2016/17
129.7 million out

Man Utd
11.5 million out
47.15 million out
58.65 million out

For City:- Thus 462.3 million in players - 129,7 mill on players going out = 332.6 million net spend
For United:- Thus 349.4 million on players in - 58.65 million on players going out = 290.75 million net spend

Are United one 42 million player away from winning 18 games and drawing one out of 19?

Schland with the biased stats again. Most people agree the difference is at most 60 million, not 120 million

Who agrees about that the shit troll you are?
It's from DailyMail like I wrote you can google it..

Here you go, difference of 42 million, is that the difference of what could be 15 points by the end of today?

[Schlandi]

Going with TransferMarkt, Schland's previous source on this

Man City
249.3 million in- 2017/18
213 million in- 2016/17
462.3 million in

Man Utd
164.4 million in- 2017/18
185 million in - 2016/17
349.4 million in

Out goings though:
Man City
94.35 million out- 2017/18
35.35 million out- 2016/17
129.7 million out

Man Utd
11.5 million out
47.15 million out
58.65 million out

For City:- Thus 462.3 million in players - 129,7 mill on players going out = 332.6 million net spend
For United:- Thus 349.4 million on players in - 58.65 million on players going out = 290.75 million net spend

Are United one 42 million player away from winning 18 games and drawing one out of 19?

Schland with the biased stats again. Most people agree the difference is at most 60 million, not 120 million

Who agrees about that the shit troll you are?
It's from DailyMail like I wrote you can google it..

Here you go, difference of 42 million, is that the difference of what could be 15 points by the end of today?

You guys told me Transfermarkt is allegedly a shit source for Transfers
Slavery City fans and Fraudiola lovers humilated

[GoonerAlexandre]

Going with TransferMarkt, Schland's previous source on this

Man City
249.3 million in- 2017/18
213 million in- 2016/17
462.3 million in

Man Utd
164.4 million in- 2017/18
185 million in - 2016/17
349.4 million in

Out goings though:
Man City
94.35 million out- 2017/18
35.35 million out- 2016/17
129.7 million out

Man Utd
11.5 million out
47.15 million out
58.65 million out

For City:- Thus 462.3 million in players - 129,7 mill on players going out = 332.6 million net spend
For United:- Thus 349.4 million on players in - 58.65 million on players going out = 290.75 million net spend

Are United one 42 million player away from winning 18 games and drawing one out of 19?

Schland with the biased stats again. Most people agree the difference is at most 60 million, not 120 million

Who agrees about that the shit troll you are?
It's from DailyMail like I wrote you can google it..

Here you go, difference of 42 million, is that the difference of what could be 15 points by the end of today?

You guys told me Transfermarkt is allegedly a shit source for Transfers
Slavery City fans and Fraudiola lovers humilated

Well, if I use the other source where City have spent less, you won't be happy. Blue Moon has an accurate transfer thread for both that shows how City have spent 100 million less than United

[Santi]

Mourinho full of shit to deflect from the fact his side were 2-0 down at home to Burnley.


Standard.