Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 7:25 pm
Please don't transfer to Arsenal-Mania!
Arsenal Website and Forum
https://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/
https://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=271&t=24420
indy23 wrote:Hope its true, we shoulda offered this last year. Especially when some jobbers on our team make 100k + hes worth three theos.
arsenalpan wrote:indy23 wrote:Hope its true, we shoulda offered this last year. Especially when some jobbers on our team make 100k + hes worth three theos.
If walcott can make 140k, sanchez should get half million or more.
BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
BexleyGooner wrote:CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.
And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.
starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.
And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.
And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.
Nuggets wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.
And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.
And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.
Who are unwilling to spend!
starmandb wrote:Nuggets wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.
And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.
And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.
Who are unwilling to spend!
Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity
starmandb wrote:Nuggets wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.
And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.
And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.
Who are unwilling to spend!
Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity
Nuggets wrote:starmandb wrote:Nuggets wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:CaptGooner wrote:starmandb wrote:BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.
It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.
Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in
Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.
Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.
And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.
And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.
Who are unwilling to spend!
Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity
Spot on