same f***ing thing every single time
get ball on wing
hold ball for 15 seconds having a little dance with the defender
go nowhere
cut back inside
chip into box
defender heads away
yawn
Va-Va-Voom wrote:Impressive that someone could read his lips in that 140p video.
Zenith wrote:Va-Va-Voom wrote:Impressive that someone could read his lips in that 140p video.
The guy saw this on his television and later recorded it with his Nokia N90.
GoonerAlexis wrote:Zenith wrote:Va-Va-Voom wrote:Impressive that someone could read his lips in that 140p video.
The guy saw this on his television and later recorded it with his Nokia N90.
Nokia N90 has 240p quality, not 144p
Zenith wrote:GoonerAlexis wrote:Zenith wrote:Va-Va-Voom wrote:Impressive that someone could read his lips in that 140p video.
The guy saw this on his television and later recorded it with his Nokia N90.
Nokia N90 has 240p quality, not 144p
't was a joke.
It's not even physically possible to shoot a 16:9 aspect ratio video with a camera that records in a totally different aspect ratio of 13:11.
144p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2k, 4k are all 16:9 ratio resolutions.
Nokia N90 shoots in this rare and outdated 13:11 ratio with its 352x416 pixels camera.
When uploaded, there would be a black border on the left and right side as the ratio of the video file wouldn't match the ratio of the web player.
In other words, you couldn't be more wrong.
GoonerAlexis wrote:Zenith wrote:GoonerAlexis wrote:Zenith wrote:Va-Va-Voom wrote:Impressive that someone could read his lips in that 140p video.
The guy saw this on his television and later recorded it with his Nokia N90.
Nokia N90 has 240p quality, not 144p
't was a joke.
It's not even physically possible to shoot a 16:9 aspect ratio video with a camera that records in a totally different aspect ratio of 13:11.
144p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2k, 4k are all 16:9 ratio resolutions.
Nokia N90 shoots in this rare and outdated 13:11 ratio with its 352x416 pixels camera.
When uploaded, there would be a black border on the left and right side as the ratio of the video file wouldn't match the ratio of the web player.
In other words, you couldn't be more wrong.
Only left and right, but still 240p
Zenith wrote:GoonerAlexis wrote:Zenith wrote:GoonerAlexis wrote:Zenith wrote:Va-Va-Voom wrote:Impressive that someone could read his lips in that 140p video.
The guy saw this on his television and later recorded it with his Nokia N90.
Nokia N90 has 240p quality, not 144p
't was a joke.
It's not even physically possible to shoot a 16:9 aspect ratio video with a camera that records in a totally different aspect ratio of 13:11.
144p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2k, 4k are all 16:9 ratio resolutions.
Nokia N90 shoots in this rare and outdated 13:11 ratio with its 352x416 pixels camera.
When uploaded, there would be a black border on the left and right side as the ratio wouldn't match the ratio of the web player.
In other words, you couldn't be more wrong.
Only left and right, but still 240p
That's because YouTube's web player has a fixed aspect ratio of 16:9.
Key word: fixed
YouTube's player includes these black borders, even though they are not part of the original video file. Cameras don't shoot black borders.
This means if a raw video file with a different aspect ratio is uploaded, the player adds black borders on each side in order to turn it into what is called a false 16:9 video.
If you were to play the raw video file above in windowed mode of any media player on your computer, you wouldn't see any borders as you're viewing it in its original, true 13:11 aspect ratio.
Hope you'll understand now.
GoonerAlexis wrote:I understand that, but the quality would still be greater than 140p, if you did add the borders, which Youtube does.
Sims wrote:Looool wtf is going on