English Premier League ~ 20/21 Season

[jayramfootball]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

We DON'T want that.
The less we take from American sport the better.

[starmandb]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

100 percent
A 60 minute game with a stopped clock
But I don’t understand why they can’t play the actual time lost for injury’s goals siubs and var
They make a big play of booking goalkeepers for time wasting
And then don’t play the time

[Jimmy Skitz]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

100 percent
A 60 minute game with a stopped clock
But I don’t understand why they can’t play the actual time lost for injury’s goals siubs and var
They make a big play of booking goalkeepers for time wasting
And then don’t play the time

I don’t want 60 minutes stay at 90 and actually enforce the time wasting rules

[Goonerred]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

They do it in Rugby Union and I think it works well. Everyone can see exactly how much time is left, the only thing I wouldn't do is that having to kick it out of play to stop the game. I saw 5 minutes extra being played in the 6 Nations because the team losing obviously didn't want to kick the ball out. Hooter goes, end of game.

[Dejan]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

We DON'T want that.
The less we take from American sport the better.

I do want that because time wasting whether we are winning or losing pisses me off so much. Its a complete waste of time (litterly)

[jayramfootball]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

We DON'T want that.
The less we take from American sport the better.

I do want that because time wasting whether we are winning or losing pisses me off so much. Its a complete waste of time (litterly)

So what? Time wasting has been part of football forever. If a team is upset at time-wasting - simple - just don't be losing towards the end of the game.
The solution is for refs to add the proper time, not have some stupid American style clock stopping. It would be chaos. I can just see it now.. the ref.. 'please put 15 seconds back on the clock' when errors are made even with the clock. No thanks. Next we'll be into timeouts and flags.
Just leave football alone and improve the refereeing.

[Phil71]

Why not use the var people to set the additional time? They can communicate it to the ref over his ear piece, then he doesn't have to worry about it.

[Goonerred]

Why not use the var people to set the additional time? They can communicate it to the ref over his ear piece, then he doesn't have to worry about it.

Hmmm, not sure about that. They're rubbish as it is.

[starmandb]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

100 percent
A 60 minute game with a stopped clock
But I don’t understand why they can’t play the actual time lost for injury’s goals siubs and var
They make a big play of booking goalkeepers for time wasting
And then don’t play the time

I don’t want 60 minutes stay at 90 and actually enforce the time wasting rules

Yes I would rather keep it at 90 mins if they add the time on for proper stoppages
I don’t want a 90 minute game with the clock stopped for every corner and throw
That would change the whole dynamic of a game that they are already messing about too much with

[starmandb]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

They do it in Rugby Union and I think it works well. Everyone can see exactly how much time is left, the only thing I wouldn't do is that having to kick it out of play to stop the game. I saw 5 minutes extra being played in the 6 Nations because the team losing obviously didn't want to kick the ball out. Hooter goes, end of game.

Absolutely when the times up It’s up
None of that see how an attack pans out bollocks
Why would that goal have more validity than a narrow offside
A rule invented to stop goal hanging has become a farce detrimental to the game

[starmandb]

That’s on FIFA and IFAB they refuse to change from the running clock system it’d be so easy to stop the clock when the ball is dead

We DON'T want that.
The less we take from American sport the better.

I do want that because time wasting whether we are winning or losing pisses me off so much. Its a complete waste of time (litterly)

So what? Time wasting has been part of football forever. If a team is upset at time-wasting - simple - just don't be losing towards the end of the game.
The solution is for refs to add the proper time, not have some stupid American style clock stopping. It would be chaos. I can just see it now.. the ref.. 'please put 15 seconds back on the clock' when errors are made even with the clock. No thanks. Next we'll be into timeouts and flags.
Just leave football alone and improve the refereeing.

Exactly
Wasting time with the ball in play is fair enough
When it’s not it isn’t

[jayramfootball]

Why not use the var people to set the additional time? They can communicate it to the ref over his ear piece, then he doesn't have to worry about it.

Hmmm, not sure about that. They're rubbish as it is.

I can just see it now... whenever we're losing ... VAR say 0 minutes.. when we're winning VAR say 30 minutes.

[Ach]

Another willock goal

[Marsbar100]

Has end product should have kept him, hopefully he will be good with a new manager

[Ach]

Newcastle get another