Inchpractice wrote:That's an absolutely f***ing brilliant photo GES, thanks.
I actually cried.
Hehe, it seemed to sum up ADS' rebuttal quite well I thought mate
by Good_Eye_Sniper » Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:56 pm
Inchpractice wrote:That's an absolutely f***ing brilliant photo GES, thanks.
I actually cried.
by bergie4ever » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:16 am
by Good_Eye_Sniper » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:51 pm
Scumbag Goon wrote:Danielson is subpar for his position
by Andreys_Does_Simples » Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:39 pm
Good_Eye_Sniper wrote:Scumbag Goon wrote:Danielson is subpar for his position
Who?
by gzagee » Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:48 pm
by Andreys_Does_Simples » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:21 pm
gzagee wrote:/\ /\
I thought Daniel san was quite good for his position in Karate Kid.
by StLGooner » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:23 pm
Ades_Dancin_Shoes wrote:gzagee wrote:/\ /\
I thought Daniel san was quite good for his position in Karate Kid.
Definately not subpar anyhow.
by Andreys_Does_Simples » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:24 pm
ChVint22 wrote:Ades_Dancin_Shoes wrote:gzagee wrote:/\ /\
I thought Daniel san was quite good for his position in Karate Kid.
Definately not subpar anyhow.
I heard they're remaking the Karate Kid with Will Smith's son as the new KK
by StLGooner » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:25 pm
by Good_Eye_Sniper » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:30 pm
Ades_Dancin_Shoes wrote:Good_Eye_Sniper wrote:Scumbag Goon wrote:Danielson is subpar for his position
Who?
Daniel San!
by Inchpräctice » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:50 pm
ChVint22 wrote:I didn't know what to think of it really. Sometimes classics should just be left alone.
by StLGooner » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:41 pm
Inchpractice wrote:ChVint22 wrote:I didn't know what to think of it really. Sometimes classics should just be left alone.
The thing about that is that it's barely old enough to be called a classic and it's on every Christmas here.
It would be like remaking E.T. or Gremlins or Back to the Future. People need to go back a bit further and do something that isn't too fresh in our minds otherwise it's just weird.
Or here's an interesting idea, why not write a new f***ing story??
by SE13 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:39 pm
Via E-Mail, Arsene Wenger wrote:Dear Supporter,
I feel it was a nervy game against Wigan. We didn't finish the game off because of our recent history and I felt that we played a little bit with the handbrake. On the other hand I must praise the team for being focused and determined to win even when they are not at their best.
Sometimes I sit in press conferences and I am told 'you played well but you didn't win' but on Saturday I was told 'you didn't play well'. We will soon try to combine good performances and good results.
It was vital to keep our momentum going after that win at Chelsea. We beat Man United but after we lost at home to Aston Villa and at Man City, so Saturday was a bigger game and we got the result we needed.
It was a difficult decision for me to take off Emmanuel Eboue in the final moments but I felt he had completely lost his confidence and could not keep the ball anymore. Of course then he became a danger. I feel it was very sad but as well I think the most important thing is that we won the game. Whether he played a minute more or less, at the end of the day it doesn't make a difference.
I was disappointed with the reception Eboue got from some fans. I think when you are a fan you are behind your players and that is what you want them to do. On the other hand I believe that Eboue will come back and show how good a player he is. For me that has happened on every pitch in the whole world and the same fans will applaud him when he comes back and plays well.
Manu is a sensitive boy who wants to do well and cares about the Club. He was tired because he didn't play for a month and on top of that it is difficult when you have the crowd on your back. You do not want the fans to do it but if you say 'do they have the right legally to do it?' then of course they do.
Thanks for your support.