nicknasty wrote:http://sportsonlaptops.blogspot.com/
That page tried to kill my PC with a trojan!
by Inchpräctice » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:32 pm
nicknasty wrote:http://sportsonlaptops.blogspot.com/
by nicknasty » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:33 pm
by nicknasty » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:35 pm
by Reverend Gooner » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:36 pm
Good_Eye_Sniper wrote:Yorkyblue wrote:Reverend Gooner wrote:Real shame as it should really be 2-2 right now at least.
No it shouldn't. It should be 2-0.
He meant if we'd taken some of our chances
by nicknasty » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:37 pm
by Inchpräctice » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:41 pm
by Inchpräctice » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:44 pm
by Good_Eye_Sniper » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:50 pm
by Inchpräctice » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:57 pm
by Inchpräctice » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:58 pm
by Good_Eye_Sniper » Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:59 pm
Inchpractice wrote:I said at the start of the season GES that Fabianski worries me.
Sure he's got talent but he's not ready to be our number 2 yet.
As I said back then imagine if Almunia has a bad injury and is out for 3 months, Fabianski will be flapping all over the place for 3 months.
He couldn't catch a cold today - spilled everything.
by UFGN » Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:10 pm
Inchpractice wrote:I said at the start of the season GES that Fabianski worries me.
Sure he's got talent but he's not ready to be our number 2 yet.
As I said back then imagine if Almunia has a bad injury and is out for 3 months, Fabianski will be flapping all over the place for 3 months.
He couldn't catch a cold today - spilled everything.
by UFGN » Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:21 pm
Reverend Gooner wrote: they have been great and i see much talent coming from them in years to come.
by Inchpräctice » Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:42 pm
by UFGN » Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:44 pm
Inchpractice wrote:I disagree UFGN, I think you can safely say that they're better than just good.
Remember that Burnley beat Chelsea and previously Fulham.