Michael Olise

Heard any rumours? This is the place to discuss potential transfer targets.

Michael Olise

Postby Ach » Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:58 pm

Arsenal, Leeds and Wolves are all keen on 18-year-old Reading midfielder Michael Olise. (Football League World)


Michael Olise
18
Midfield
Reading

Aurora a smokescreen for this dude
Ach
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 35624
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:25 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby alexafc12 » Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:12 pm

who
alexafc12
Arsène Wenger
Arsène Wenger
 
Posts: 15188
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Zenith » Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:47 pm

Certainly has one or two tricks up his sleeve.



Image
User avatar
Zenith
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 38022
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:48 pm
Location: Across the North Sea, 200-something miles away from The Grove

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Ach » Tue Feb 22, 2022 7:52 pm

Crystal Palace midfielder Michael Olise is attracting interest from Arsenal, Chelsea and Bayern Munich, claims The Sun.

The highly-rated 20-year-old is approaching the end of his first year as a Premier League player and could be offered another step up the football food chain a year on from leaving Reading for Selhurst Park.

Ach
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 35624
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:25 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Ach » Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:34 pm

Crystal Palace starlet Michael Olise is attracting interest from Arsenal and Lille as England and France battle it out for his international future, reports the Daily Mail.

The 20-year-old midfielder is eligible for four nations – with Nigeria and Algeria also in the mix – and may have a big decision to make at club level this summer as interest in his services builds.



Done pretty well
Ach
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 35624
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:25 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Marsbar100 » Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:29 pm

Looks a relly good prospect
Aaron Ramsey aka "The Drought Killer" 2008-2019
User avatar
Marsbar100
Predictions League 2022-23 Winner
Predictions League 2022-23 Winner
 
Posts: 13861
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:30 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Ach » Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:31 pm

Arsenal are targeting a summer move for Crystal Palace and France Under-21 winger Michael Olise, with the 21-year-old valued at more than £40m. (Football Transfers)


Looks good one game. Absolute shit the other
Ach
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 35624
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:25 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Salibatelli » Thu Apr 13, 2023 10:28 am

Another winger, this obsession with wingers is like Wengers with central midfielders, before you know it we’ll have so many wingers they’ll be appearing at full back.

We don’t really need more wingers, Jesus, Martinelli, Trossard and Saka are all wingers.
Salibatelli
Member of the Year 2023
Member of the Year 2023
 
Posts: 16302
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Arsenal Tone » Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:20 pm

Cover for Saka, just what we need. But is he really that much better than Nelson and Marquinhos?
Raya/Ramsdale
White/Tomiyasu--Saliba/Timber--Gabriel/Kiwior--???/Zinchenko
???/Jorginho
Odegaard/Smith Rowe----Rice/???
Saka/Jesus-------------------Martinelli/Trossard
???/Havertz
User avatar
Arsenal Tone
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 40751
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby alexafc12 » Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:45 pm

alexafc12 wrote:who
alexafc12
Arsène Wenger
Arsène Wenger
 
Posts: 15188
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Michael Olise

Postby RowdyRoddyPoppins » Tue Aug 15, 2023 4:45 pm

Chelsea buying this lad as well for £35 mill. Their spending has to be investigated surely?
RowdyRoddyPoppins
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7812
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:44 am
Location: Moe's Tavern

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Salibatelli » Tue Aug 15, 2023 5:38 pm

35 million for Olise, what a bargain!

Don’t know how Chelsea are doing this but it might be they are banking on selling Lukaku, Ziyech, Hudson-Odoi, Cucurella, Chalobah and perhaps even Gallacher or Colwill.

A lot of money to be recouped there and they seem pretty good at player sales.
Salibatelli
Member of the Year 2023
Member of the Year 2023
 
Posts: 16302
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Marsbar100 » Tue Aug 15, 2023 5:56 pm

Would have been a good addition for us
Aaron Ramsey aka "The Drought Killer" 2008-2019
User avatar
Marsbar100
Predictions League 2022-23 Winner
Predictions League 2022-23 Winner
 
Posts: 13861
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:30 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby Salibatelli » Wed Aug 16, 2023 9:36 am

Basically Chelsea have split the cost of these players over years so they have payments of about 135 million a year but have sold 200 million worth of players so still have 65 million or so they can spend on their balance sheet.

These long term contracts are allowing them to split the amounts on their balance sheets to allow for transfers.
Salibatelli
Member of the Year 2023
Member of the Year 2023
 
Posts: 16302
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:26 pm

Re: Michael Olise

Postby jayramfootball » Wed Aug 16, 2023 10:58 am

Salibatelli wrote:Basically Chelsea have split the cost of these players over years so they have payments of about 135 million a year but have sold 200 million worth of players so still have 65 million or so they can spend on their balance sheet.

These long term contracts are allowing them to split the amounts on their balance sheets to allow for transfers.


That's what every club does.
Chelsea used unusually long contracts initially to spread the cost over a longer period but that has been stopped - 5 years is the max amortisation now.

Don't get carried away with Jordans explanation - he was dumbing it down for football fans.
Amortisation is only part of the accounting practices clubs adopt.

Impairment is another that Chelsea - and any club can use - If they do well in a given year (win the league, go deep/win the CL) and have a healthy profit, Chelsea can dump a bigger loss into 1 year through impairment and reduce ongoing amortisation costs.

Contract extensions also reduce amortisation costs - If after 4 years , Chelsea give a an extension to a player for say an additional 2 years to the current deal, they can amortise the remaining fee on the books for an extended period.

Also players sold at a loss can actually be a profit wrt to FFP transactions. It depends how much is left to be amortised when then deal is done. Chelsea bought Havertz for 10m more than they sold him, but in the accounts for the year it will be about a £35m profit for them.

Also not sure where the Premier league is in their review of Residuals. Some clubs have in the past used residuals to reduce annual amortisation by creating a residual value for a player at the end of the contract and thus pre loading the cost of purchase with an anticipated sales amount - i.e. amortising the net cost to reduce the annual cost.

Bottom line is it's a waste of time to worry about it - accountants are literally pulling multiple levers with respect to FFP in order to comply.
Chelsea would not be doing what they are doing if they didn't have a plan wrt FFP.

Some clubs bend the rules way too far as we know with City and Chelsea in the past, but that is what accountants are paid for - making sure the rules are used and stretched as far as possible without breaking them.

For us, we've spent a net £380m since Arteta took over up to end of 2022, but our actual annual player cost per year (excluding wages) had only risen by £30m since 2018. Over those years our wages cost was dramatically lower and covered all our increase in player purchase costs. We're now back to the wage levels we once had, but have additional revenue to offset due to the CL.
User avatar
jayramfootball
Member of the Year 2021
Member of the Year 2021
 
Posts: 27018
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:58 pm

Next

Return to Arsenal's Rumour Mill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests