Zenith wrote:Not even United are ludicrous enough to pay £80m for a player who'd struggle to get into their starting XI.
Remove his nationality and homegrown status and you have a player who's worth about £35m in today's market.Phil71 wrote:One of the worst things about the PL era is that most of our fans became finance directors.
Why does anyone give a shit about how much a player may or may not cost? If the club have the money to pay it, what's the problem. We get a very good player added to the squad.
Because value for money directly influences squad quality and quality has a great influence on where you end up in the table. That, in turn, influences your transfer budget which allows you to make those big-money gambles every now and then.
It's also not reflecting well upon those who were/are responsible for recruitment that 4 out of our 5 last big-money acquisitions have either struggled with consistency (Pépé, Laca) or turned out to be a waste of money (Xhaka, Mustafi). The only player who, thus far, has lived up to his premium price tag is Aubameyang and he has entered the last year of his contract.
That's roughly £250m spent on players who, collectively, wouldn't command a third of that amount if they were sold. Sold? Yes because, unless Kroenke decides to Abramovic-type owner and starts sanctioning deals from his own pocket, the club can't just continue to spend £80m on good (albeit nowhere near world class) players without getting into serious trouble with UEFA regarding FFP.
Wouldn't you agree that—given the position we find ourselves are in—it's in our best interest for those in charge of recruitment to finally starting using the club's financial resources wisely? I mean it's, nota bene, the main reason we find ourselves in the situation we're in.
£35 million in todays market gets you a Torriera or Cebellos level player not Grealish. Even if he wasn't home grown or British, he'd still cost upwards of £60 million in todays market.