ESFSAFC wrote:Diaby > Rosicky, different players with different attributes but I always preferred what Diaby could have given over what Rosicky could have given.
He was crippled by someone who had no business being on a pitch.
What does pulling a Rosicky mean? Rosicky averaged 27 apps which includes subs in his 9 years here so far where as Diaby averaged 18. Either is terrible.
Hope it's short term, he deserves an extended run of game time.
Random Diaby in background.
It's the, "What could have been," debate, so let's leave it there.
Unlike Diaby, and with the exception of Liverpool at Anfield, Rosicky has actually shined for us, even if it's in patches.