Wojciech Szczęsny

All football talk from anywhere except The UK. Includes Champions League, Europa Cup, transfer news and general World Football chat.

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby MesutOzil11 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:54 pm

Well played Zenith :clap: :rofll:
User avatar
MesutOzil11
David Rocastle
David Rocastle
 
Posts: 2474
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:04 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby Va-Va-Voom » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:03 pm

Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon


Tbf Mesut said the same thing and he followed Szczesny closely -

Mesüt wrote:Told u last season they already bought Alisson to be their future number 1 but would keep Szczesny for another year while he settles n develops.

User avatar
Va-Va-Voom
Member of the Year 2015
Member of the Year 2015
 
Posts: 22641
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:01 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby bengulnaci1 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:04 pm

The Champions League finalists wanted and bought him. That says plenty.

Wenger obviously had a problem with him. We should have kept him but that's the way it goes....
User avatar
bengulnaci1
Nigel Winterburn
Nigel Winterburn
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 2:25 am
Location: Not far, actually

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby BS221B » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:08 pm

Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon

Zenith wrote:
BS221B wrote:Agenda? its a fact. Napoli decided to continue with 34 yo Pepe Reina instead of buying Szczesny for peanuts and Rome bought a GK while he was there.

Szczesny is homegrown in England like Pickford but Everton decided to spend £30m on pickford than buying Szczesny for peanuts.

You said there was no interest in Szczesny from Napoli's end which is factually not true.

De Laurentiis publicly expressed the club's interest in Szczesny on multiple occasions, but Napoli lost out on his as soon as Juventus joined the race.

Arsenal goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny wants to extend his stay at Roma, the president of the Serie A side James Pallotta has said.

"He told me that he wanted to stay with us," Pallotta told radio station SiriusXM. "I'll say more, I was surprised by the fact some of the players I thought had wanted to leave came up to me before and after the final game to say they wanted to remain.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... s-pallotta

:naughty:

both Napoli and Rome has never showed serious interest in him. If there were some serious interest, he'd be playing for them rather than sitting on Juventus bench.
Image
User avatar
BS221B
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 6410
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby MesutOzil11 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:18 pm

BS221B wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon

Zenith wrote:
BS221B wrote:Agenda? its a fact. Napoli decided to continue with 34 yo Pepe Reina instead of buying Szczesny for peanuts and Rome bought a GK while he was there.

Szczesny is homegrown in England like Pickford but Everton decided to spend £30m on pickford than buying Szczesny for peanuts.

You said there was no interest in Szczesny from Napoli's end which is factually not true.

De Laurentiis publicly expressed the club's interest in Szczesny on multiple occasions, but Napoli lost out on his as soon as Juventus joined the race.

Arsenal goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny wants to extend his stay at Roma, the president of the Serie A side James Pallotta has said.

"He told me that he wanted to stay with us," Pallotta told radio station SiriusXM. "I'll say more, I was surprised by the fact some of the players I thought had wanted to leave came up to me before and after the final game to say they wanted to remain.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... s-pallotta

:naughty:

both Napoli and Rome has never showed serious interest in him. If there were some serious interest, he'd be playing for them rather than sitting on Juventus bench.


For a season and then become number 1 at one of the best clubs in the world.

Why would he want to go back to Roma or move to Napoli when they aren't going to do anything major any time soon?

Buffon has plenty of praise for him. They've obviously got big plans for him.
User avatar
MesutOzil11
David Rocastle
David Rocastle
 
Posts: 2474
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:04 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby Zenith » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:23 pm

Va-Va-Voom wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon


Tbf Mesut said the same thing and he followed Szczesny closely -

Mesüt wrote:Told u last season they already bought Alisson to be their future number 1 but would keep Szczesny for another year while he settles n develops.


So have I considering there's several fellow countrymen who play for Roma.

The now retired De Arthritis had just turned 86 and was showing signs of decline. Lobont and Skorupski were considered as unreliable and error prone and Roma were in dire need of another keeper and Allison was aqcuired. Little did they know Szczesny would have a fantastic 2016-17 season after a 2015-16 season in which he had his ups and downs.

Fact of the matter remains, Allison was heavily out of favor and had to make do with the odd Coppa Italia appearance whereas Szczesny was the undisputed no.1 and was considered by many as the best performing keeper in Italy.

If they were so certain about Alisson being an upgrade, Szczesny would have been dropped at some point during the season.
Image
User avatar
Zenith
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 38022
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:48 pm
Location: Across the North Sea, 200-something miles away from The Grove

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby MesutOzil11 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:29 pm

Zenith wrote:
Va-Va-Voom wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon


Tbf Mesut said the same thing and he followed Szczesny closely -

Mesüt wrote:Told u last season they already bought Alisson to be their future number 1 but would keep Szczesny for another year while he settles n develops.


So have I considering there's several fellow countrymen who play for Roma.

The now retired De Arthritis had just turned 86 and was showing signs of decline. Lobont and Skorupski the were considered as unreliable and error prone and Roma were in dire need of another keeper and Allison was aqcuired. Little did they know Szczesny would have a fantastic 2016-17 season after a 2015-16 season in which he had his ups and downs.

Fact of the matter remains, Allison was heavily out of favor and had to make do with the odd Coppa Italia appearance whereas Szczesny was the undisputed no.1 and and was considered by many as the best performing keeper in Italy.

If they were so certain about Alisson being an upgrade, Szczesny would have been dropped at some point during the season.


This.

Makes no sense.
User avatar
MesutOzil11
David Rocastle
David Rocastle
 
Posts: 2474
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:04 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby Cripps » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:46 pm

Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon

Considering hes now on juves bench and Alisson is number one at Roma, Sun was right. They bedded him in and now he's ready they've dumped Szczesny. He wanted to stay. They had no interest
Cripps
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 43234
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:05 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby BS221B » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:49 pm

Zenith wrote:
Va-Va-Voom wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon


Tbf Mesut said the same thing and he followed Szczesny closely -

Mesüt wrote:Told u last season they already bought Alisson to be their future number 1 but would keep Szczesny for another year while he settles n develops.


So have I considering there's several fellow countrymen who play for Roma.

The now retired De Arthritis had just turned 86 and was showing signs of decline. Lobont and Skorupski the were considered as unreliable and error prone and Roma were in dire need of another keeper and Allison was aqcuired. Little did they know Szczesny would have a fantastic 2016-17 season after a 2015-16 season in which he had his ups and downs.

Fact of the matter remains, Allison was heavily out of favor and had to make do with the odd Coppa Italia appearance whereas Szczesny was the undisputed no.1 and was considered by many as the best performing keeper in Italy.

If they were so certain about Alisson being an upgrade, Szczesny would have been dropped at some point during the season.

We dont know the details of loan so its pointless to make comment on it. Perhaps we had a clause with Rome where it says players have to play as long as he feels fit/ready.

Also lol at saying why would he want to back at Rome, he didnt want to leave there at first place. Dude has been pushed out twice at this season, you cant blame him for crying at press conference.
Image
User avatar
BS221B
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 6410
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby MesutOzil11 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:54 pm

BS221B wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Va-Va-Voom wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon


Tbf Mesut said the same thing and he followed Szczesny closely -

Mesüt wrote:Told u last season they already bought Alisson to be their future number 1 but would keep Szczesny for another year while he settles n develops.


So have I considering there's several fellow countrymen who play for Roma.

The now retired De Arthritis had just turned 86 and was showing signs of decline. Lobont and Skorupski the were considered as unreliable and error prone and Roma were in dire need of another keeper and Allison was aqcuired. Little did they know Szczesny would have a fantastic 2016-17 season after a 2015-16 season in which he had his ups and downs.

Fact of the matter remains, Allison was heavily out of favor and had to make do with the odd Coppa Italia appearance whereas Szczesny was the undisputed no.1 and was considered by many as the best performing keeper in Italy.

If they were so certain about Alisson being an upgrade, Szczesny would have been dropped at some point during the season.



Also lol at saying why would he want to back at Rome, he didnt want to leave there at first place. Dude has been pushed out twice at this season, you cant blame him for crying at press conference.


You're probably right, he didn't want to at the time.

Then Juve came sniffing...
User avatar
MesutOzil11
David Rocastle
David Rocastle
 
Posts: 2474
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:04 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby BS221B » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:56 pm

Sky Sports News HQ understands Juventus have agreed a deal in principle to sign Szczesny for €16m (around £14m) from Arsenal, but Pallotta says the Poland international shot-stopper wants to stay in Rome.

"He told me that he wanted to stay with us," Pallotta told radio station SiriusXM. "I'll say more, I was surprised by the fact some of the players I thought had wanted to leave came up to me before and after the final game to say they wanted to remain.

full quote :dontknow:

they didnt want to keep him, simply as that.
Image
User avatar
BS221B
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 6410
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby Zenith » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:13 pm

Cripps wrote:
Zenith wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.


/thread

Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.

However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.

Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.

"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon

Considering hes now on juves bench and Alisson is number one at Roma, Sun was right. They bedded him in and now he's ready they've dumped Szczesny. He wanted to stay. They had no interest

Dumped Szczesny? You keep making things up.

His loan contract simply expired and he was officially on Arsenal's books and Arsenal's books only.

You can't ''dump'' players you do not own.
Image
User avatar
Zenith
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 38022
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:48 pm
Location: Across the North Sea, 200-something miles away from The Grove

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby Zenith » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:18 pm

BS221B wrote:
Sky Sports News HQ understands Juventus have agreed a deal in principle to sign Szczesny for €16m (around £14m) from Arsenal, but Pallotta says the Poland international shot-stopper wants to stay in Rome.

"He told me that he wanted to stay with us," Pallotta told radio station SiriusXM. "I'll say more, I was surprised by the fact some of the players I thought had wanted to leave came up to me before and after the final game to say they wanted to remain.

full quote :dontknow:

they didnt want to keep him, simply as that.

In that quote he solely states Szczesny wanted to stay and that was months before the Serie A Champions showed interest by making a formal bid for him.

Where does Pallotta say he didn't want to keep Szczesny?

You're moving goalposts, again.
Image
User avatar
Zenith
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 38022
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:48 pm
Location: Across the North Sea, 200-something miles away from The Grove

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby BS221B » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:30 pm

im just interpreting what ive read.

> Juve agrees terms with Szczensy but Polatta says that he wanted to stay at Rome. Which means that Rome could have signed him if they wanted but they decided not to.
Image
User avatar
BS221B
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 6410
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Szczesny signs for Juventus

Postby Arsenal Tone » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:37 pm

If i were szczesny, i'd jump at the chance to learn from buffon. At buffon's age he can't play every game so its likey szczesny will get game time too.
Raya/Ramsdale
White/Tomiyasu--Saliba/Timber--Gabriel/Kiwior--???/Zinchenko
???/Jorginho
Odegaard/Smith Rowe----Rice/???
Saka/Jesus-------------------Martinelli/Trossard
???/Havertz
User avatar
Arsenal Tone
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 40751
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:03 pm

PreviousNext

Return to World Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests