Zenith wrote:Cripps wrote:Zenith wrote:Cripps wrote:Roma did have the option to turn Szczesny’s move into a permanent one.
However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.
/thread
Yes because articles published by The Sun are more reputable regarding Italian football transfers than the most reputable newspaper in Italy.However, they are not expected to explore that possibility due to the fact they see Brazilian Alisson as being their No1.
Another howler by The Sun; Since Alisson's arrival Szczesny has been the undisputed no. 1 and made over 39 appearances in a single season, whereas Allison has spent over 3420 minutes warming the bench. 38 games in which he wasn't favored to Szczesny to be precise.
"He was the best goalkeeper in the Serie A in terms of consistency, and saves made." —Gianluigi Buffon
Considering hes now on juves bench and Alisson is number one at Roma, Sun was right. They bedded him in and now he's ready they've dumped Szczesny. He wanted to stay. They had no interest
Dumped Szczesny? You keep making things up.
His loan contract simply expired and he was officially on Arsenal's books and Arsenal's books only.
You can't ''dump'' players you do not own.
Semantics. You know what I meant. They had no interest in buying him once Alisson was considered ready. Not making anything up. No need to. I leave that to you and others.