In Arsène We Trust ~ Victoria Concordia Crescit

[Marsbar100]

We ran out of legs by then, didn't we lose to united 3 days before, we didn't have a big squad

No we didn't have a big enough squad

As was repeatedly complained about by myself and others at the time

In 04 or you talking 07/08

[UFGN]

We ran out of legs by then, didn't we lose to united 3 days before, we didn't have a big squad

No we didn't have a big enough squad

As was repeatedly complained about by myself and others at the time

In 04 or you talking 07/08

In 07/08 certainly not

But we never really had the depth necessary

Not since the days of Kanu as third best striker

[Va-Va-Voom]

We ran out of legs by then, didn't we lose to united 3 days before, we didn't have a big squad

We bottled it against United too.

Dominated them, they have once chance and score.

Henry came off bench.

That's why I don't rate the Invincibles as high as others, they bottled the treble within the space of a few days.

[Marsbar100]

We ran out of legs by then, didn't we lose to united 3 days before, we didn't have a big squad

We bottled it against United too.

Dominated them, they have once chance and score.

Henry came off bench.

That's why I don't rate the Invincibles as high as others, they bottled the treble within the space of a few days.

Tbf when united won the treble they had crazy depth up top and they still had luck beyond belief

[theHotHead]

So then the question I have is, which team was better, Wenger's first double winning squad with Overmars and Adams et al or the Invincibles ?

[Marsbar100]

Double team lost 6 times and got 78 points, not that much in today's terms, have to go with the invincibles quite easily

[UFGN]

So then the question I have is, which team was better, Wenger's first double winning squad with Overmars and Adams et al or the Invincibles ?

It is always better to win more trophies

Given the choice at the start of any season, I'd rather we win the double than go unbeaten

[starmandb]

So then the question I have is, which team was better, Wenger's first double winning squad with Overmars and Adams et al or the Invincibles ?

It is always better to win more trophies

Given the choice at the start of any season, I'd rather we win the double than go unbeaten

Exactly how i feel
You can go unbeaten and get 38 points
Coming top and winning trophys is all that matters regardless of how its done

[LegendaryKeown]

And this is why Pep's season was better than the Invincible one, imo. You enjoy wins, and Pep had more of those

[Ach]

And this is why Pep's season was better than the Invincible one, imo. You enjoy wins, and Pep had more of those

Lol

[Va-Va-Voom]

And this is why Pep's season was better than the Invincible one, imo. You enjoy wins, and Pep had more of those

You must also think Mourinho's first season with Chelsea was better than the Invincibles then.

[StLGooner]

And this is why Pep's season was better than the Invincible one, imo. You enjoy wins, and Pep had more of those

I betcha Pep would rather have no losses though.

[LegendaryKeown]

And this is why Pep's season was better than the Invincible one, imo. You enjoy wins, and Pep had more of those

You must also think Mourinho's first season with Chelsea was better than the Invincibles then.

Yes

[Marsbar100]

City and chelsea's was done with silly money, invincibles is a far bigger achievment

[StLGooner]

Right! City pretty much got to assemble an all star team. Just think what Wenger could have done with that team in his good years.