theHotHead wrote:Zedie wrote:theHotHead wrote:Losmeister wrote:jayramfootball wrote:Hopefully the performance today by Ceballos will go a long way to shutting the traps of those that whined all summer that we loaned him.
i dont recall a single poster complaining about Dani...
Bare people complained about it being a waste of time stop gap short term signing.
Bare people complained about it being a loan with no option to buy, thus not actually resolving anything longterm.
The revisionism from you lot is different level.
Shouldn't be too hard for you and jayram to find some 'I don't want cabellos' posts to actually prove your points...
Mate thats EXACTLY what I am talking about, ffs. Thanks for confirming. Even if we didnt have an option to buy, if Ceballos performs how he did and its just for a year, c'est la vie, he has done exactly what was asked of him - and more. How can anyone therefore complain the loan was a bad idea?? Think about it
A loan for a year with no purchase agreed at the end of it is a poor situation because it's not longterm planning to move us forward.
He kills it this year and city, PSG, Man U etc. Will undoubtedly come in and blow us out of the water with a big offer.
Even if we match, it will take an offer that could potentially drain our transfer funds for players like upamenco etc.
-It goes against everything you've been arguing for ie longterm planning for the squad
-working on a humble budget
Etc.
You lot making excuse about selling ozil mkhi mustafi etc. That leaves us without money to balance off against purchases again like the funds needed to get a baller like this.
If we dont sign him, hes become a key cog in our system that we then need to start from the start again, while weve show cased him to the oil clubs like a prized lamb.
Finally, to those that are hanging off perez 'promise' to look at a transfer, that's worth f**k all. Mans a shark and will shot to the highest bidder.
A real promise would have been an option to buy but we didnt get that did we.
To repeat, no one is saying hes a bad player, we are simply saying we didnt sign him on the best terms and should have at minimum got an option to buy or first refusal etc.
It's actually pretty straight forward, I'm really not sure why you're banging your head like any of this is completely baffling.