StockGooner wrote:I don't like it, it really irks me but I suppose it's £25m over 5 years.
What we're saying is that Eddie is better than any other player we could get for £25m over the next 5 years. That and he has more value now than he did 2 weeks ago. Again, I don't like it but that's the logic I guess.
It's similar to Auba. Nobody was happy we paid him £300k a week, but we said that £45m (Over 3 years iirc) invested in him was better than any other player we could get for £45m incl. wages and transfer fee. Now that didn't work out, but I think the logic holds true for Eddie as it did for Auba.
What's the alternative at £25m? A Josh King? Pukki?
Pukki scores goals in a rank bad shit team, according to stats we create heaps of chances ask Jay