EliteKiller wrote:So many weaknesses in his game, he's 28 not 19 yet his positional sense, his awareness of opposition players, his ability to spot a pass all of these basic skills are sadly lacking ... at his age he won't get any better. No wonder Besiktas didn't want to take up their option to buy, he's not even at their level.
Why are you making stuff up?
Beşiktaş were delighted with his performances and fans were gutted when the club indicated they couldn't afford him.
Besiktas manager Sergen Yalcin has explained how the financial situation at the club has cost them the opportunity to sign Mohamed Elneny permanently from Arsenal.
The 28-year-old teamed up with the Black Eagles on a season-long loan from the Gunners last summer with the Turkish Super Lig side having an option to sign the midfielder permanently.
The Egypt international delivered convincing performances during his temporary stay at Vodafone Park, featuring in 27 league games to help them finish third in the table.
Yalcin admitted the quality of the midfielder but revealed the club’s financial struggles forced them not to sign him.
“Elneny was the player we wished that he wouldn’t go, but his cost was too high,” Yalçın said in a press conference.
“He played in the starting line-up in the Arsenal vs Liverpool match. He has a high cost but is a quality football player. For us Besiktas, we have to adjust our budget and balance the budget given by TFF.”
And no their financial situation wasn't used as a pretext. In fact, it's so bad they were unable to pay his loan fee and his salary remained unpaid for months.
Additionally, Beşiktaş's poor financial state is directly reflected in their transfer expenditures last summer: €850k.
And no, I'm not trying to make a case for Elneny.