Page 133 of 164

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:42 pm
by GoonerAlexandre
MesutOzil11 wrote:
Sims wrote:I don't think he has a future as a top level CB. Don't think he's close to Holding


It's still very close to call.

Despite Boro being awful last season, Chambers had a good season for him personally and Boro fans heaped praise on him plenty of times.

He also had a good tournament for the u21's aswell.

He's definitely improved and he can only get better so I do find this quite strange as to why we're selling him instead of loaning him out again.

This

They were nowhere near relegation when he was fit. When he was injured, they became the worst team in the league. Was the meanest defence of the league when he was fit.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:13 am
by Santi
should be 25m just for his age and nationality, then it's ok.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:39 am
by gooney
Mesüt wrote:should be 25m just for his age and nationality, then it's ok.

its greed that has forced us to keep so many average players for too long. Chambers isnt rated by wenger.....move him on. I remember us turning down 7 million for bendtner wanting more. In the end we let him on free

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:52 am
by Mike Dean
How did he do on loan last season?

I didn't have any confidence in him here. He has had some atrocious performances particularly two matches against Liverpool.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:56 am
by Cripps
He was shit

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2017 3:13 pm
by BS221B
Arsenal and Crystal Palace move closer to agreeing Calum Chambers deal

https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... are_btn_tw

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:55 pm
by Arsenal Tone
Is he fit? If he is then two LBs paired at CB showed how much Wenger believes in his ability lol

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 10:09 am
by Arsenal Tone
20m bid from Leicester rejected, not for sale. SSN

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 10:12 am
by Lolzil
Madness.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 10:15 am
by KG3
Can't believe we rejected it, should have taken the money and ran or offered Chambers + 20-30M for Mahrez

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:16 pm
by Zedie
Tony_Adams wrote:20m bid from Leicester rejected, not for sale. SSN


Apparently we turned down a follow up 27m. Obvs getting a lot of game time this season.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:20 pm
by bengulnaci1
Then again we rejected £10m for Gibbs, then accepted £7m, so not sure how much faith we can place in this.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:41 pm
by KG3
Zedie wrote:
Tony_Adams wrote:20m bid from Leicester rejected, not for sale. SSN


Apparently we turned down a follow up 27m. Obvs getting a lot of game time this season.


I'm seeing sources claiming we want 28M, if that 27M offer is real we should take it as it would basically cover the mustafi transfer.

Koscielny, Mustafi, Holding, Mertesacker, Monreal, Bielik is enough numbers wise with a switch to a back four and all of them aside from Birlik are better centre backs than him anyway, heck it's probably enough for a back 3 too Chelsea managed to survive with just Azp, Luiz, Cahill, Terry and Zouma who was injured for most part of it.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:15 am
by ESR10
Big question mark, why he didn't even feature in the squad yesterday.
If we don't intend to use him, we should have accepted Leicesters bid for him.
Imo he should get the time Holding is getting at least. Holding has been shit this season, but is still playing.

Same with Debuchy. With Oxlade leaving, he isn't a bad alternative to Bellerin. Why not use him, instead of freezing him out. He is getting his wages anyway. With playing him we could justify these wages and maybe get other teams interested in him, if we intend to drop him soon.

Re: Calum Chambers (21)

PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:51 am
by CaptGooner
Mustafi wrote:Big question mark, why he didn't even feature in the squad yesterday.
If we don't intend to use him, we should have accepted Leicesters bid for him.
Imo he should get the time Holding is getting at least. Holding has been shit this season, but is still playing.

Same with Debuchy. With Oxlade leaving, he isn't a bad alternative to Bellerin. Why not use him, instead of freezing him out. He is getting his wages anyway. With playing him we could justify these wages and maybe get other teams interested in him, if we intend to drop him soon.

Because Wenger