Rockape wrote:Bottom line is, why do we have to instantly have these childish knee jerk post after every game bringing these differences back up?
Well, I think that is slightly OTT....Ach's comments are clearly tongue in cheek and mine certainly aren't knee jerk. The fact is that we believe we can't afford to let Rambo go without at least negotiating with him. As I've pointed out before, replacing him for a £30m player on £150k a week will cost more than paying him £250k a week, so its not a ransom, its just what players at the end of the contracts are able to do.
We pay Miki £180k a week FFS and look how much influence he had yesterday! Rambo may infuriate occasionally, but he makes things happen and yesterday he was the difference between possibly only drawing the game instead of winning it. If they don't want to pay £250k a week, then lets try for less.......but we want the Club to try!Welbeck unfortunately could be without a club and without a contract for a year now because he attempted that same game.
Indeed, so you have to admire him all the more for not playing like he's trying to avoid injury, but playing with more passion than our highest paid player!
Yeah I thought it was a bit obvious. im assuming we are talking the suicide watch comment. Ffs gw was built in great one liners such as that.
Apparently we should just agree with each other on everything though.
As for Ramsey, it's obvious some don't like him and can't credit him even after an excellent performance. I called them out. Do I do the same? Go back and read the welbeck thread after he's scored and read my reactions. Everyone on here knows what I think of welbeck. But I'm delighted when he scores and would love it absolutely love it if he shut me up by doing it more. Never does.
Can't say the same about Ramsey