Re: Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (14)
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 6:28 pm
If Auba stays on w/ us for another two years, he should overtake RVP.
Arsenal Website and Forum
https://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/
https://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=271&t=24424
Angelito wrote:Auba has indirectly slated Xhaka and Emery.
Ozil highlighted an appalling second half in his Insta post.
We already have an issue with Auba and Laca's contracts now. This is going to turn out really ugly if we don't act soon.
We cannot afford to lose Auba or Laca.
jayramfootball wrote:Angelito wrote:Auba has indirectly slated Xhaka and Emery.
Ozil highlighted an appalling second half in his Insta post.
We already have an issue with Auba and Laca's contracts now. This is going to turn out really ugly if we don't act soon.
We cannot afford to lose Auba or Laca.
No player is irreplaceable.
Even the hint of an issue on contract extensions should place them both on the transfer list in January.
Angelito wrote:jayramfootball wrote:Angelito wrote:Auba has indirectly slated Xhaka and Emery.
Ozil highlighted an appalling second half in his Insta post.
We already have an issue with Auba and Laca's contracts now. This is going to turn out really ugly if we don't act soon.
We cannot afford to lose Auba or Laca.
No player is irreplaceable.
Even the hint of an issue on contract extensions should place them both on the transfer list in January.
This isn't a time of loony tales.
We have to identify the problem and work to rectify it rather than being existential about it.
The person who should go straight to the bin is the manager. Majority of Arsenal fans didn't see this coming because they didn't want to.
How many goals have we scored without Auba and Laca this season?
Exactly.
In life, knowing when to strike is the most important thing. But more often than not, we live in a bubble that idealizes a situation, romanticizes it, and the end result is an unfavorable one.
Yet, life goes on.
Only, it could have been different.
But it isn't yet it still goes on.
Only it would have been better.
What's best is not having that debate because you're wise enough to understand the tides of time.