Page 695 of 806

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:18 am
by Nuggets
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:
CaptGooner wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.

It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.

Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in

Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.

Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.

And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.

And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.


Who are unwilling to spend!

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:28 am
by starmandb
Nuggets wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:
CaptGooner wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.

It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.

Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in

Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.

Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.

And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.

And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.


Who are unwilling to spend!

Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:33 am
by Nuggets
starmandb wrote:
Nuggets wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:
CaptGooner wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.

It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.

Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in

Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.

Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.

And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.

And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.


Who are unwilling to spend!

Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity



Spot on :clap:

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:56 pm
by CaptGooner
starmandb wrote:
Nuggets wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:
CaptGooner wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.

It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.

Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in

Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.

Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.

And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.

And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.


Who are unwilling to spend!

Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity

Agreed 100%. In theory, we could spend like City considering our shareholders.. But I would take spending the money that is available on ~4 smart buys that strengthen need areas.

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:40 pm
by Dejan
Nuggets wrote:
starmandb wrote:
Nuggets wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:
CaptGooner wrote:
starmandb wrote:
BexleyGooner wrote:If he's not going to renew and PSG offer us £50m or more, we have to take it. Otherwise all that will happen, as you well know, is that he will have a decent season, we still won't win the premier league and then he'll bugger off to the Champions, City, making them even more dominant, and we won't have a dime to replace him.

It hurts bad I know, but it's the only real option.

Arsenal are valued at 1.7 billion
We don't need to sell anybody for money
We should be bringing em in

Think his point is he'd rather him go to PSG versus City at end of year.

Yep. Couldn't bear seeing him at City. You just know he'd score a winner against us.

And we might be worth 1.7 bill, but that's not liquid assets. It's the club, the stadium, the brand, the very same plastic chair you stick your arsecheeks in each week. It has no correlation to the size of the transfer pot. If it did, we'd be able to buy like City or PSG.

And every time you say something like that you are allowing the powers that be at arsenal to plead the poor mouth and feed the utter bollocks of how can we compete with Chelsea , city psg etc, we are now and always have been a very rich club.


Who are unwilling to spend!

Exactly
It is utter bollocks
We have chosen not to compete
That's why we dropped 8 points before the window closed in 11/12
Our business should be done by the start of the season
If a bonus opportunity arrives at the end of the window that's what it should be
A bonus opportunity



Spot on :clap:

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:43 pm
by Goonerfromafrica
So Alexis just tweeted and the location on the tweet said Paris. He took off the location just a few minutes ago. Ouch.

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:43 pm
by MesutOzil11

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:44 pm
by BexleyGooner
Goonerfromafrica wrote:So Alexis just tweeted and the location on the tweet said Paris. He took off the location just a few minutes ago. Ouch.

But he wants to play football at the Emirates with Richard Marx.

I'm done tbh. I just don't know what to think next.

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:45 pm
by MesutOzil11
It was always going to cause speculation.

Players have been given a break and are away with their partners ect. Sanchez has taken his girlfriend to Paris which obviously now means he's joining PSG lol

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:47 pm
by Sims
The entirety of PSG's camp, including their director of football, is in Guingamp

Tweeting about playing at the Emirates whilst in Paris is a baller move though

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:49 pm
by MesutOzil11

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:53 pm
by Sims
The whole squad have the weekend off, Xhaka was on holiday somewhere

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:18 pm
by Gooner_LK6
Hmm why did he delete the tweet is my only concern. If its only a holiday, then just leave it out there or even better just say youre on holiday. Footballers make this too hard honestly.

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:31 pm
by GoonerAlexandre
I will take your word @richardmarx and when you want we can play football at the Emirates Stadium

What does this mean though?

Re: Alexis Sanchez (7)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 3:20 pm
by MesutOzil11
That he wants a kickaround with his pal at the Emirates stadium.