Granit Xhaka

All football talk from anywhere except The UK. Includes Champions League, Europa Cup, transfer news and general World Football chat.

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Losmeister » Wed Aug 15, 2018 5:28 pm

Xhaka was totally irrelevant

I thoughht thats what Xhaka means???
Kai Havertz nutmegged ur GK
User avatar
Losmeister
George Graham
George Graham
 
Posts: 13365
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:16 am
Location: Cotati, California, USA

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby StLGooner » Wed Aug 15, 2018 5:44 pm

Arsenal~Fanatic wrote:
Pudpop wrote:
Tony_Adams wrote:I just feel he's being scapegoated. Ramsey, for example, did a lot less!
Ramsey was out of position and yet still spearheaded our press quite well.

Xhaka failed at the very things he's supposed to be good at


+1

Funny thing is Ramsey was one of our better players till he was subbed. He was trying to stem the flow and make sh8t happen while Xhaka was totally irrelevant.



The one great thing I will give Ramsey is his commitment to the cause. He's usually always lively, always pressing, always running his head off. He'd die for the team if you let him.
Formerly ChVint22
User avatar
StLGooner
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 35991
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Arsenal Tone » Wed Aug 15, 2018 5:48 pm

I thought, considering he was playing in his preferred position (CAM), Rambo had a poor game.
Raya/Ramsdale
White/Tomiyasu--Saliba/Timber--Gabriel/Kiwior--???/Zinchenko
???/Jorginho
Odegaard/Smith Rowe----Rice/???
Saka/Jesus-------------------Martinelli/Trossard
???/Havertz
User avatar
Arsenal Tone
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 40777
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby StLGooner » Wed Aug 15, 2018 5:50 pm

Tony_Adams wrote:I thought, considering he was playing in his preferred position (CAM), Rambo had a poor game.



Attacking wise yes, he didn't do enough. Off the ball he was his usual self.
Formerly ChVint22
User avatar
StLGooner
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 35991
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Santi » Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:53 am

How do you know that's he preferred position? For me he doesn't have a single trait of a proper CAM/#10.


His late runs are that of a B2B midfielder which is what he once was before his ego inflated to the size of a hot air balloon.
Image
User avatar
Santi
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 40602
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:11 am

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Arsenal Tone » Fri Aug 17, 2018 11:40 am

Actually, he sees himself as playing the cazorla role:

https://www.arsenalreport.com/posts/aar ... d-position
Raya/Ramsdale
White/Tomiyasu--Saliba/Timber--Gabriel/Kiwior--???/Zinchenko
???/Jorginho
Odegaard/Smith Rowe----Rice/???
Saka/Jesus-------------------Martinelli/Trossard
???/Havertz
User avatar
Arsenal Tone
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 40777
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby KG3 » Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:32 pm

Marsbar100 wrote:
Fenice wrote:
Zenith wrote:
StLGooner wrote:That's disrespectful to Cesc. If Xhaka had half the touch and technical ability as Cesc we'd be ok.
User avatar
KG3
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 6066
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:35 pm

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Santi » Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:24 pm

Tony_Adams wrote:Actually, he sees himself as playing the cazorla role:

https://www.arsenalreport.com/posts/aar ... d-position


Which is where he should be and then doing the Lampard style late entry to the box. If he could get over himself then he'd be fine.

Plus Cazorla had a brain 100x quicker. Ramsey is either a player who acts on instinct (see his great goal last season) or takes too long to think, there's no in between and the instinct is usually in the box rather than anywhere else.

Not many can replicate Cazorla's footballing brain, Ramsey has never been close. They have completely different styles but could fill a similar role, he doesn't need to be fancy.
Image
User avatar
Santi
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 40602
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:11 am

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby StLGooner » Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:26 pm

Santi wrote:
Tony_Adams wrote:Actually, he sees himself as playing the cazorla role:

https://www.arsenalreport.com/posts/aar ... d-position


Which is where he should be and then doing the Lampard style late entry to the box. If he could get over himself then he'd be fine.

Plus Cazorla had a brain 100x quicker. Ramsey is either a player who acts on instinct (see his great goal last season) or takes too long to think, there's no in between and the instinct is usually in the box rather than anywhere else.

Not many can replicate Cazorla's footballing brain but Ramsey has never been close, completely different styles but could fill a similar role, he doesn't need to be fancy.


Bingo, said this the other day about Ramsey. He does phenomenal things with no space in the box, but in midfield he shits himself.
Formerly ChVint22
User avatar
StLGooner
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 35991
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby theHotHead » Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:30 pm

Santi wrote:How do you know that's he preferred position? For me he doesn't have a single trait of a proper CAM/#10.


His late runs are that of a B2B midfielder which is what he once was before his ego inflated to the size of a hot air balloon.

Exactly this, box to box midfielder.
User avatar
theHotHead
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 20591
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:44 am
Location: Norf Landon

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby DiamondGooner » Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:36 pm

Tony_Adams wrote:Actually, he sees himself as playing the cazorla role:

https://www.arsenalreport.com/posts/aar ... d-position


:rofll:
Image
User avatar
DiamondGooner
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 30444
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:35 am
Location: At the Gucci store

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby LegendaryKeown » Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 am



Anyone ever remember a worse compilation for someone's game? :rofll:
When you give a voice to stupid people, it makes them more stupid and not more intelligent
LegendaryKeown
Thierry Henry
Thierry Henry
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 7:25 pm

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Byron Gomez » Sat Aug 25, 2018 10:13 am

Awful, awful player. can't believe some of the Shiite that play for us these days ffs.
"I've play against him, what? 12, 15, 18 times? , I dunno". "And only once he didn't moan and on that day we lost!" - Jose Mourinho
Byron Gomez
Charlie George
Charlie George
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:22 pm

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Angelito » Sat Aug 25, 2018 10:46 am

Came across this on Reddit

XGBuildup looks at the expected goals of every possession in which a particular player is involved but doesn’t either take a shot or play a key pass (a pass that leads to a shot). In other words, it’s an attempt to measure how players contribute to attacking moves when they’re doing the hard work of moving the ball forward and not the glamorous shooting or assisting. Xhaka led Arsenal with a measure of 0.63 xGBuildup per 90 minutes last season.

The problem is, Xhaka is also a terrible defender. His range is limited and his defensive anticipation is next to nonexistent. Last season, as Arsenal tried (poorly) to press opponents, he was over-exposed and expected to patrol way more territory than he was equipped to handle. Still, it’s not surprising that Xhaka made exactly zero interceptions and only one successful tackle against Chelsea in the first half of an attacking slugfest on Saturday.

Xhaka was bad defensively, so it’s understandable that Emery would choose to replace him with Lucas Torreira at halftime. And in some ways, Arsenal did become more difficult to break down. Rather than trying to step in front of Chelsea and intercept the ball, Arsenal stood off, kept their shape, and defended in their own half. After having eight interceptions in the first half, they only had four in the second, but they blocked five shots, up from one, cleared the ball a remarkable 15 times, up from eight in the first half, and successfully completed 10 of 15 tackles, up from 4 of 8 in the first half.

But the story on offense was also that of a reversal. Without Xhaka, Arsenal simply couldn’t turn its defensiveness into attacking chances. Though they were heavily out-possessed in the first half, Arsenal was actually quite even in the attacking third, completing 43 passes to Chelsea’s 44. But in the second half, Chelsea completed 108 attacking-third passes while Arsenal completed only 32 of their own. Consequently, despite being a more disciplined defensive team, Arsenal were outshot a whopping 15 to three in the second half.

https://theathletic.com/481663/2018/08/ ... thout-him/


Confirms the obvious. He's not good enough to play in a midfield two, or a three. But his playmaking abilities are vastly underrated. Precisely why, I wanted a complete CM in the summer. We don't have a driving force in the middle, or a well-rounded DLP.

If we want Xhaka in the middle, we have play him alongside Guen and Torreira. Xhaka - Ramsey - Torrira against "lesser" sides would be fine.

It's concerning that we have two so called midfield players who cannot hold the CM position on their own.

Guezdouzi - Torreira - Ozil or Guendouzi - Torreira - Xhaka are our best options.
Image
User avatar
Angelito
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 30571
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Lyra

Re: Granit Xhaka (34)

Postby Jedi » Sat Aug 25, 2018 10:58 am

I don't buy that, there's too many factors to the attacking stats in the 2nd half to attribute half of it or even less to Xhaka coming off. Kovacic and Hazard were fantastic after they came on as subs and thats why we lost.
User avatar
Jedi
Bertie Mee
Bertie Mee
 
Posts: 8305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:47 pm

PreviousNext

Return to World Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests