jayramfootball wrote:Timing of this seems suspicious too.
On the back of the media pile on trying to pin all postponements due to Covid on Arsenal.
This claim is from the betting company who have to pay out.
For all we know a newspaper bunged them a few quid to make the claim in order to create a story.
I wonder where people stand on the Daniel Sturridge thing. He got a ban for his brother putting on a potential move. I read his argument which was one of essentially; if they're going to take a bet on my life, that's on them, but I am going to tell friends and family about my move.
I feel for him here, at the end of the day that betting company are making money off him, based on odds etc, so when it goes wrong they cry wolf? Doesn't seem fair.
This one rumoured now is a bit more suspect as that is impacting on game results. I don't like betting and the impact it has on the game and lives anyway, but just personal to me. Others will love it and others will dabble but it's here to stay