Page 5 of 115

Re: Mamadou Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:11 am
by TartanRaven
TheSKAGooner wrote:Actually, his name is Marouane Chamakh. Don't know where I got the Mamadou thing from, and now I'm disappointed that I won't be yelling that when he scores for the Gunners. :crybaby:

In any event, here's an article with some vid.

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/26-05-09/5517842.html


:arsenal3: :arsenal3: :arsenal3:

I've decided that his nickname shall be BabyCham! "The Beverage Of Pissed Poofters Everywhere"

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:22 am
by Fabby
Fabby wrote:I'm gonna have a quick look how many Ade got in his last season before he came to us.

At Monaco, Ade scored 20 in 100 games.

Thats only 1 in 5. Thing is, Ade was 21 when he came here and still learning, Chamakh is 25 so surely reaching his full potential? If it takes him a year to settle in he'll be almost 27. From what I've read he'll fit in with our style of play perfectly, its just he probably won't put the ball in the net.

Makes me feel good.


BTW He scored 1 in 15 in his last season

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:27 am
by Fordy
:rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll:

This is what you new strikers goal record is

Image

I say your new striker because we all know this is who Wenger will sign he already said so weeks ago lol

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:29 am
by Fordy
Hes only scored 53 goals 7 years lol

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:32 am
by TartanRaven
BABYCHAM! BABYCHAM!! :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :arse fan:

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:35 am
by rogerthornhill
I think that AW being willing to sign him is a good enough indication that he can be an, at least, adequate replacement for Ade. Chamakh plus an experienced midfielder instead of Ade :think: that sounds like a good deal to me.

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:36 am
by TartanRaven
rogerthornhill wrote:I think that AW being willing to sign him is a good enough indication that he can be an, at least, adequate replacement for Ade. Chamakh plus an experienced midfielder instead of Ade :think: that sounds like a good deal to me.

Adequate during the CL qualifying rounds.... :hiding:

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:41 am
by Fabby
Fordy wrote::rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll:

This is what you new strikers goal record is

Image

I say your new striker because we all know this is who Wenger will sign he already said so weeks ago lol

:doh:

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:45 am
by chrisbishop69
Fordy wrote::rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll:

This is what you new strikers goal record is

Image

I say your new striker because we all know this is who Wenger will sign he already said so weeks ago lol


u love having digs at arsenal, iit makes me laugh

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:56 am
by InTheNorthBank
Fabby wrote:
Fordy wrote::rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll:

This is what you new strikers goal record is

Image

I say your new striker because we all know this is who Wenger will sign he already said so weeks ago lol

:doh:


Yeah, as I commented elsewhere, his strike rate is poor and worse than Bendtner's for Arsenal which at first glance is a slap in the face.

But by all accounts, Chamakh is a link up man and brings people into play. We already have goal scorers in Eddie and RvP, someone like Chamakh could prove to be the perfect outlet for them to play alongside. For me it's a case of either or with RvP and Eddie as I don't think they'd be an ideal partnership...that's not to say it will never work, as inevitably it will on occasions.

Either way, we don't have a problem scoring goals, it's at the other end, so while Chamakh might prove to be an underwhelming signing, I'd rather we sign him and a quality CB or DM as opposed to spunking all our money on someone like Huntelaar.

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:58 am
by Fordy
chrisbishop69 wrote:
Fordy wrote::rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll: :rofll:

This is what you new strikers goal record is

Image

I say your new striker because we all know this is who Wenger will sign he already said so weeks ago lol


u love having digs at arsenal, iit makes me laugh



I am just providing facts i take no pressure from it

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:01 am
by chrisbishop69
y would u take pressure?

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:05 am
by Goose
Never a truer word spoken Goonerdane

If we get rid of Ade and use the money to buy 2-3 experienced players, I am happy with that

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:05 am
by Fordy
I meant pleasure lol

Re: Marouane Chamakh

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:09 am
by TartanRaven
chrisbishop69 wrote:y would u take pressure?

He took no pleasure from it....but when he saw the stats, he larfed so hard, he released some pressure. :lol: