ChVint22 wrote:Space wrote:Fordy wrote:liam_cork wrote:you seem to think world class footballers grow on tree's? we'v kept senderos, with nasri and walcott comin back. signings would have been nice but only if they can make us better obviously the players available weren't up to that standard
so your telling me in the hole of world football there is not one player at a resonable price who could be and do a better job than say Eboue and diaby, think about we are talking the hole world.
Kranjcar 2 million better than Eboue and daiby ?
Kranjcar in the team ahead of a fully fit Cesc, Rosicky, Nasri, Arshavin, Walcott?
No chance. We didn't want/need him.
Yea I agree, we don't need Kranjcar or better than Eboue, Diaby, we another DM and maybe another CB.
Arsenals first choice team is quality but how many times this year do you think your strongest team will play?
Teams dont win anything squads do its as simple as that, most of the posts i make about signing players are not meant to be just replacing first team players its about making the squad/subs better.
In the player ratings the other day most people gave eboue and daiby 4s and 5s why stick with these players and even if they do become good in a few years it will have taken 5 or 6 years whats the point.
Kranjcar 2m would do a much better job than either of them now this season im sure he wouldnt expect to be first choice, yes hes older and wont last as long. Well buy another soding player in a few years to replace him.
Yes your team is strong enough but your squad will win f**k all and it really is as simple as that your ment to be one of the strongest teams in the prem and the best you can put out in midfield against man utd is eboue and diaby.
Every year i say these things and every year i get given the same reasons as to why im wrong and every year you win f**k all so just maybe its not me thats wrong.
Also every year for the last few years your squad players are ment to have got beeter in pre season in reality they still the same bag of wank they was the year before.