Froch V Groves

Who will win?

Froch
5
71%
Groves
2
29%
 
Total votes : 7

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Tony_Adams » Sat May 31, 2014 10:57 pm

LOL nobody can figure out who is arguing with who or who said what to who!! This thread is hilarious!
Image
User avatar
Tony_Adams
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 34987
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby alexafc12 » Sat May 31, 2014 10:58 pm

Callum wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:Not really. You were the one who first said>

"Haven't heard of either of them."

Then a minute later you said you thought Froch would win, even though you had never heard of him...

Then in the first round which was always going to be cagey, you said "This is shit... WWE over boxing anyday"

You were the one who started talking about wrestling. And then laughed at me when I said its scripted.

I never said WWE was better than boxing, I said MMA was. Cripps was the first one to bring up WWE, not me.

Get your facts straight before you get yourself all worked up.


I think you'll find I'm responding to Cripps not you Callum
Image
User avatar
alexafc12
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Cripps » Sat May 31, 2014 10:58 pm

Plymöuth Gööner wrote:LOL nobody can figure out who is arguing with who or who said what to who!! This thread is hilarious!

More entertaining than mma or boxing ;)
Cripps
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 43234
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:05 pm

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Callum » Sat May 31, 2014 10:59 pm

alexafc12 wrote:I think you'll find I'm responding to Cripps not you Callum

Why did you quote me then?
User avatar
Callum
Poster Of The Month
Poster Of The Month
 
Posts: 34478
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 6:58 pm
Location: Kieran Tierney's back pocket

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby alexafc12 » Sat May 31, 2014 10:59 pm

Callum wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:No one's saying wrestling is shit, but your posting in a boxing thread with boxing fans. So don't bring up wrestling and then complain when people have a go at you.

I didn't bring up WWE, Cripps did. Go read back what was said before you spit the dummy out. Fool.


Go back and realize I have been the only one in the thread defending you and the comment was made at Cripps. You fool. :lol:
Image
User avatar
alexafc12
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Tony_Adams » Sat May 31, 2014 11:00 pm

Plymöuth Gööner wrote:LOL nobody can figure out who is arguing with who or who said what to who!! This thread is hilarious!
Image
User avatar
Tony_Adams
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 34987
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby alexafc12 » Sat May 31, 2014 11:00 pm

Callum wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:I think you'll find I'm responding to Cripps not you Callum

Why did you quote me then?


I didn't? lol?
Image
User avatar
alexafc12
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Cripps » Sat May 31, 2014 11:00 pm

alexafc12 wrote:
Callum wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:Not really. You were the one who first said>

"Haven't heard of either of them."

Then a minute later you said you thought Froch would win, even though you had never heard of him...

Then in the first round which was always going to be cagey, you said "This is shit... WWE over boxing anyday"

You were the one who started talking about wrestling. And then laughed at me when I said its scripted.

I never said WWE was better than boxing, I said MMA was. Cripps was the first one to bring up WWE, not me.

Get your facts straight before you get yourself all worked up.


I think you'll find I'm responding to Cripps not you Callum

He edited his post and took the fool bit out lol

Yes I mentioned wwe only cos mma was mentioned as being better than boxing.

I'd have been happy keeping it at that but some pubber, could have been yourself or Callum started a rant about how it's not real and scripted blah blah.

Thus you had to be out in place and now you have, we can put an end to it and move on to the boxing
Cripps
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 43234
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:05 pm

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Callum » Sat May 31, 2014 11:01 pm

alexafc12 wrote:
Callum wrote:
Cripps wrote:Oh dear.

I guess we can add wrestling to football to things you know little about.

I just started a tennis and cricket thread in this section. Maybe you know a thing or two about them.

I hope so cos as hard as I try not to, I'm losing faith in you and your path to being a dumbass will be complete. Not there yet though.

Come on son

Professional wrestling isn't a sport because it's not real. I don't have an issue with people liking it but it's clear that the vast majority of adults prefer real sport where the ending isn't scripted as opposed to WWE.

You can insult me all you like but I'm not being goaded into another stupid debate with you. If you really think that you're right and majority of other adults are wrong then go for it.


Yet in the first page you said: "Haven't heard of either of them."

So don't question people's knowledge of boxing when you know f**k all about the sport yourself.

You quoted me here!
User avatar
Callum
Poster Of The Month
Poster Of The Month
 
Posts: 34478
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 6:58 pm
Location: Kieran Tierney's back pocket

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby alexafc12 » Sat May 31, 2014 11:02 pm

Cripps wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Plymöuth Gööner wrote:Ffs one of the biggest uk fights of the year and we're arguing about wrestling being fake!

The punch:

https://vine.co/v/MpagjuJUblE

I tried to keep it to the boxing but others are intent to ruin the thread.

Seen the punch.

This groves pubber isn't very good is he?

No defence at all. Mertesacker would be rolling in his grave


Not really. You were the one who first said>

"Haven't heard of either of them."

Then a minute later you said you thought Froch would win, even though you had never heard of him...

Then in the first round which was always going to be cagey, you said "This is shit... WWE over boxing anyday"

You were the one who started talking about wrestling. And then laughed at me when I said its scripted.

I'm still laughing tbh.

As for the haven't heard of either of them comment, tongue in cheek. I wasn't serious but the uneducated can't take jokes it seems.


Nice of you to make an assumption on my education when you don't know a thing about me.
Image
User avatar
alexafc12
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby alexafc12 » Sat May 31, 2014 11:02 pm

Callum wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:
Callum wrote:
Cripps wrote:Oh dear.

I guess we can add wrestling to football to things you know little about.

I just started a tennis and cricket thread in this section. Maybe you know a thing or two about them.

I hope so cos as hard as I try not to, I'm losing faith in you and your path to being a dumbass will be complete. Not there yet though.

Come on son

Professional wrestling isn't a sport because it's not real. I don't have an issue with people liking it but it's clear that the vast majority of adults prefer real sport where the ending isn't scripted as opposed to WWE.

You can insult me all you like but I'm not being goaded into another stupid debate with you. If you really think that you're right and majority of other adults are wrong then go for it.


Yet in the first page you said: "Haven't heard of either of them."

So don't question people's knowledge of boxing when you know f**k all about the sport yourself.

You quoted me here!


I was backing up what you had said in response to Cripps!! JESUS!! :rofll:
Image
User avatar
alexafc12
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Callum » Sat May 31, 2014 11:03 pm

Has anybody actually told Cripps WWE isn't real yet though? :think:
User avatar
Callum
Poster Of The Month
Poster Of The Month
 
Posts: 34478
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 6:58 pm
Location: Kieran Tierney's back pocket

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby alexafc12 » Sat May 31, 2014 11:04 pm

Lol this is jokes.
Image
User avatar
alexafc12
Dennis Bergkamp
Dennis Bergkamp
 
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Cripps » Sat May 31, 2014 11:06 pm

alexafc12 wrote:
Cripps wrote:
alexafc12 wrote:
Cripps wrote:
Plymöuth Gööner wrote:Ffs one of the biggest uk fights of the year and we're arguing about wrestling being fake!

The punch:

https://vine.co/v/MpagjuJUblE

I tried to keep it to the boxing but others are intent to ruin the thread.

Seen the punch.

This groves pubber isn't very good is he?

No defence at all. Mertesacker would be rolling in his grave


Not really. You were the one who first said>

"Haven't heard of either of them."

Then a minute later you said you thought Froch would win, even though you had never heard of him...

Then in the first round which was always going to be cagey, you said "This is shit... WWE over boxing anyday"

You were the one who started talking about wrestling. And then laughed at me when I said its scripted.

I'm still laughing tbh.

As for the haven't heard of either of them comment, tongue in cheek. I wasn't serious but the uneducated can't take jokes it seems.


Nice of you to make an assumption on my education when you don't know a thing about me.

You're an arsenal fan. Uneducated, named alex, a kid.

Anything else?
Cripps
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 43234
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:05 pm

Re: Froch V Groves

Postby Cripps » Sat May 31, 2014 11:06 pm

Callum wrote:Has anybody actually told Cripps WWE isn't real yet though? :think:

Story lines aren't. Moves are.
Cripps
SE13
SE13
 
Posts: 43234
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:05 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Boxing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest