by Arsenal Tone » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:45 pm
by gzagee » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:51 pm
by Arsenal Tone » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:53 pm
by UFGN » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:56 pm
by gzagee » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:56 pm
by UFGN » Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:01 pm
by arseman » Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:26 pm
by gzagee » Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:44 pm
arseman wrote:I think the 71 double team was better than that one....quite a statement considering I never saw them play
by Cheese » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:49 pm
by Gunflash » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:13 am
by gzagee » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:25 am
Gunflash wrote:I bought our 90/91 season video for just £4 a few years ago. What a bargain! That team was probably the most underrated of all our championship-winning sides in the last 20 years. The defence was solid (apart from the Lee Sharpe aberration) and we had some brilliant creative and attacking talent - Limpar, Davis, Merson, Rocastle, Smith, Campbell. That team was capable of playing some excellent attacking football, contradicting the traditional view of George Graham's Arsenal. Only one defeat in the league...they said it would never be beaten! Limpar said in an interview for an Arsenal book that it was this Arsenal team that "knocked Liverpool of their perch" but history has been rewritten to serve Ferguson's ends.
by Libertine » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:12 pm
gzagee wrote:Arsenal's 90/91 team only had liverpool as any real threat.
by gzagee » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:21 pm
Libertine wrote:gzagee wrote:Arsenal's 90/91 team only had liverpool as any real threat.
I disagree with that mate.
Although Liverpool were "the" team to beat, Leeds, Man Utd and even the yids were also considered title challengers at the time.
by Hairymarble » Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:59 am
by gooneritis » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:38 am
gzagee wrote:One defeat all season if i recall rightly?