Goonersworld

3.0 out of 10? That will be an improvement then.

I'm jokingly hard on Diaby, but he had a good run playing for the national team, and time spent training and recovering might see him edge out jack. When he is on form, Diaby is commanding in midfield.

He's still shit

Massa wrote:He's still shit

This

I don't understand how Wenger thought he was the new Vieira. Time will tell I guess, I mean Song was labelled as crap but became better

diaby over denilson any day

gunRAR wrote:diaby over denilson any day

Talent wise yes, effort wise no. Denilson is very limited but the boy puts in the effort. Diaby is a lazy c***.

Diaby gives the ball away too much and despite his size, Wilshere has more of a physical presence than Diaby.

I have only seen Diaby play well in the 'second striker', 'in the hole' role and we have about eight players who are better than Diaby who play in that position!

Popey wrote:and jack deserves to start ahead of him at the moment. he was out for 8 weeks I think?!?

10 weeks

Fabrestuta wrote:The fact that you can remember his good games should tell you why not starman. Look Diaby has talent but sorry he's shit. Unless he wears a France kit 90% of the time he deserves to be executed.

no it suggests that he has been good in 3 of the games out of 7 that he has featured in
cosidering he has played in a side who in the timeframe since his debut against them has won 2 in 10 singling him out seems very unfair
the only time he was below par against them was the 4-1 home defeat and there were 2 players who were equaly as culpable.also 1 of those games was an 18 minute sub appearance at stamford bridge in 07/08 when we lost sagna so it really is unfair to rate

Plymouth Gooner wrote:Diaby gives the ball away too much and despite his size, Wilshere has more of a physical presence than Diaby.

I have only seen Diaby play well in the 'second striker', 'in the hole' role and we have about eight players who are better than Diaby who play in that position!

Yes, exactly. Diaby also has no vision or footballing intelligence, give him 2 options and he'll always choose the worst. So he can only perform in the hole with no responsibilities yet he can't be a playmaker. He is, by definition, f***ing useless

starmandb wrote:

Fabrestuta wrote:The fact that you can remember his good games should tell you why not starman. Look Diaby has talent but sorry he's shit. Unless he wears a France kit 90% of the time he deserves to be executed.

no it suggests that he has been good in 3 of the games out of 7 that he has featured in
cosidering he has played in a side who in the timeframe since his debut against them has won 2 in 10 singling him out seems very unfair
the only time he was below par against them was the 4-1 home defeat and there were 2 players who were equaly as culpable.also 1 of those games was an 18 minute sub appearance at stamford bridge in 07/08 when we lost sagna so it really is unfair to rate

Just because he has been good against Chelski a few times doesn't make it unfair to rate him. More often than not he is useless. I am not going to give him a pass because of a few good performances, on any other team he would be nothing more than a bench warmer.

starmandb wrote:

Popey wrote:and jack deserves to start ahead of him at the moment. he was out for 8 weeks I think?!?

10 weeks

Not good enough, I want it to the minute!

Tonight wasted a perfectly good opportunity for a 4th goal - which would surely have guaranteed us the match - but also made some important defensive headers late on in the game.

Worthy of his substitute appearance tonight.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fabrestuta wrote:

starmandb wrote:

Fabrestuta wrote:The fact that you can remember his good games should tell you why not starman. Look Diaby has talent but sorry he's shit. Unless he wears a France kit 90% of the time he deserves to be executed.

no it suggests that he has been good in 3 of the games out of 7 that he has featured in
cosidering he has played in a side who in the timeframe since his debut against them has won 2 in 10 singling him out seems very unfair
the only time he was below par against them was the 4-1 home defeat and there were 2 players who were equaly as culpable.also 1 of those games was an 18 minute sub appearance at stamford bridge in 07/08 when we lost sagna so it really is unfair to rate

Just because he has been good against Chelski a few times doesn't make it unfair to rate him. More often than not he is useless. I am not going to give him a pass because of a few good performances, on any other team he would be nothing more than a bench warmer.

i said not to rate him in an 18minute sub appearance not overall
this all began from somebody saying i hope he does,nt play to which i answered with 3 good games he has had against chelsea.you carry on wishing injurys on our players though...thats the way forward