by gooney » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:47 am
by Dejan » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:31 am
ivän itchybüm wrote:Better referee and we would have won btw...
by ThereIsBearCüm » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:37 am
Dejan wrote:ivän itchybüm wrote:Better referee and we would have won btw...
go f**k yourself
im sick of f***ing hearing people complain about the f***ing referee and its f***ing doing my head in goddamned.
Grow some fuckking balls. We didnt win becuase we were shit.
by Pudpop » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:41 am
by Dejan » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:47 am
Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
Pudpop wrote:Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
by ThereIsBearCüm » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:48 am
Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
by Angelito » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:49 am
Dejan wrote:ivän itchybüm wrote:Better referee and we would have won btw...
go f**k yourself
im sick of f***ing hearing people complain about the f***ing referee and its f***ing doing my head in goddamned.
Grow some fuckking balls. We didnt win becuase we were shit.
by Pudpop » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:05 pm
Dejan wrote:Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
And decisions go never in our favour? its always against the arsenal? every ref hates us right?
And Mikel was a yellow, neville's analysis was spot on. The 'challenge' on theo was way too soft to be given a penalty. If we did that 'challenge' in our box and the ref gave a penalty, everyone would be f***ing fuming. Ramires could of been given a red. Who cares, Ref's are human. We didnt win because of the referee is bullshit mate.
We didnt win because our striker in general failed to score, our manager failed to make any type of subsitutions and in general everyone bar a few were underpar.
ThereIsBearCüm wrote:Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
Yes. That's football.
Neither Mikel or Ramires should have seen red, our players have put in tackles like that and not been sent off, and Walcott went down extremely easily, if one of those had been given against us I'd be livid. Also note how you don't count the times when we've benefited from refereeing you disagree with.
Pudpop wrote:Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
by ThereIsBearCüm » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:11 pm
Pudpop wrote:ThereIsBearCüm wrote:Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
Yes. That's football.
Neither Mikel or Ramires should have seen red, our players have put in tackles like that and not been sent off, and Walcott went down extremely easily, if one of those had been given against us I'd be livid. Also note how you don't count the times when we've benefited from refereeing you disagree with.
The 'challenge' on Theo? The last time we've been given a penalty that soft was WBA last year. Yeah, we get some decisions going for us. But do you honestly think that Dean would have done nothing had Ramires gone down in the box? Please.
by Pudpop » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:15 pm
ThereIsBearCüm wrote:Pudpop wrote:ThereIsBearCüm wrote:Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
Yes. That's football.
Neither Mikel or Ramires should have seen red, our players have put in tackles like that and not been sent off, and Walcott went down extremely easily, if one of those had been given against us I'd be livid. Also note how you don't count the times when we've benefited from refereeing you disagree with.
The 'challenge' on Theo? The last time we've been given a penalty that soft was WBA last year. Yeah, we get some decisions going for us. But do you honestly think that Dean would have done nothing had Ramires gone down in the box? Please.
Irrelevant, Ramires didn't go down in the box. You can't use hypotheticals to determine whether a referee hates us or not.
by Arsenal Tone » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:33 pm
by ThereIsBearCüm » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:39 pm
Pudpop wrote:ThereIsBearCüm wrote:Pudpop wrote:ThereIsBearCüm wrote:Pudpop wrote:Sorry, but after Arteta's red against Napoli, Giroud's red against Fulham, Van Persie's red against Barca, etc. and all the penalties that Chelsea and Spurs have received this season, you expect us to ignore the challenges from Mikel and Ramires and Theo's penalty?
Ivan said we would have won with a better referee. He's right. If we played better we would have also won. But we're better than Chelsea. Which is why when we played like crap last night we still deserved to win, but the ref cost us.
Yes. That's football.
Neither Mikel or Ramires should have seen red, our players have put in tackles like that and not been sent off, and Walcott went down extremely easily, if one of those had been given against us I'd be livid. Also note how you don't count the times when we've benefited from refereeing you disagree with.
The 'challenge' on Theo? The last time we've been given a penalty that soft was WBA last year. Yeah, we get some decisions going for us. But do you honestly think that Dean would have done nothing had Ramires gone down in the box? Please.
Irrelevant, Ramires didn't go down in the box. You can't use hypotheticals to determine whether a referee hates us or not.
Is it relevant that the last time we received a soft penalty was over a year ago and that we have missed out on two penalties in 2 big games?
by Dejan » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:40 pm
Plymöuth Gööner wrote:Dejan's posts in this thread are bang on the money.
by kazgooner » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:44 pm
by Popey » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:46 pm