Arsenal 0-0 Chelsea | Premier League 23/12/13

[RowdyRoddyPoppins]

Just got in from watching the game with some friends, well what can you say?

Same old shit, same old Wenger (no subs???? what the f*ck??) same old shite performance against a rival!

We aren't gonna win shit this season, its another top 4 is best! Im bored till next season.

GTFO Wenger!

You get your fair share of ludicrous Arsenal fans around here dont you :X

Go and get molested by your Uncle, you know u love it

[DiamondGooner]

Well, we're 12 hours away from the 4th place trophy, it was nice impersonating a top side, but all good things must eventually come to an end.

Tell me some more....

Considering the 8 point cushion we could of had if we had beat Everton, Man City and an easy Chelsea I'd say that's pretty bad.

If we give City the benefit of the doubt for a win that still would of left us 5 points clear at the top.

Now we have to out do an in form Liverpool, a rampaging City and even Chelsea breathing down our necks 2 points behind.

This is where the quality in firepower is going to seal the deal, top 3 teams are on form their match winners as opposed to our very average striker is what will make the difference.

[Kyle?]

If we sign a good striker in January, my faith will increase, but we have no chance of winning anything with the Potato starting.

[Santi]

You can't always blame the ref but the image below says it all:

[Massa]

Better referee and we would have won btw...

Better striker too. You make your own luck

[Massa]

If we sign a good striker in January, my faith will increase, but we have no chance of winning anything with the Potato starting.

The amount of times I've said we won't win the league with Giroud. Consistently showing why not.

[kronickaos]

Games should never be left to a referee's decisions. Lack of quality play is what lost the match, not Mike Dean, Santa Claus, or anyone else not playing for Arsenal on the pitch.

[Santi]

Mate look at the f***ing picture, you telling me our lack of quality play always coincides with Mike Dean refereeing the game? If we'd scored that penalty we could've easily won 1-0 without playing great (many teams win this way shock) and therefore it had an influence on the game.

[Massa]

Chelsea hit the bar tbf

[Santi]

Yes they did, doesn't get you a goal, nor does a penalty hence it would've only been a chance (just a pretty good one). Not solely blaming the ref at all, that's pretty naive, but he is always a c*** when he refs our games and does cost us points.

[gooney]

Mate look at the f***ing picture, you telling me our lack of quality play always coincides with Mike Dean refereeing the game? If we'd scored that penalty we could've easily won 1-0 without playing great (many teams win this way shock) and therefore it had an influence on the game.

There's no guarantee we would win the game if we got the penalty. You cant take one incident in a game and tilt it in you favour and assume everything would be the same. If we got the penalty and actually scored. I believe there would be more goals in the game. Chelsea would open up abd go for it and we would have more space. Completely different game. But look at our record against Chelsea and United and I dont think ref is the reason. we are a team with no tactic....we are predictable and have the same approach. That can work when you are better than the opposition. But when you are not, your lack of tactical ability will hurt you

[Santi]

I've just said that but you were probably posting before I made my next comment. Scoring the penalty would've done exactly what you said, 1-0 changes the game and makes Chelsea come to play therefore becoming a different game. IMO we would win that game with the way we have been defending bar the City game, either 1-0 or 2-1 with much more space to attack.

I fail to see how we can have a clear penalty decision given against us and people don't seem to see it as a big point in the game.

[AAIRE99]

I dont care what neville or carra say theres no way that was a penalty, walcott was going f***ing nowhere and he dived. common sense has to apply and a foul outside the box is not always a foul inside the box.

[Santi]

His feet were swept from under him, in what world that is a dive I will never know.

[AFC10]

I dont care what neville or carra say theres no way that was a penalty, walcott was going f***ing nowhere and he dived. common sense has to apply and a foul outside the box is not always a foul inside the box.

Lol a dive.

This is a f***ing dive