Goonersworld

Plymöuth Gööner wrote:LOL, look at us asking his opinion as if because he has the stats he knows all!!!

Omphi93 wrote:Starman, stats aside,

In your opinion in terms of versatitlity and the type of play Walcott is suited to, would you refer to him as a limited player?

This is not saying how good he is or isnt at what he does, just asking whether you would consider him limited?

Would you also consider him consistent in terms of regular or consistent good performances?

Plymöuth Gööner wrote:LOL, look at us asking his opinion as if because he has the stats he knows all!!!

Omphi93 wrote:

Plymöuth Gööner wrote:LOL, look at us asking his opinion as if because he has the stats he knows all!!!

I dont think anyone actually knows what his stance is, all i see are numbers lol.

starmandb wrote:

Omphi93 wrote:Starman, stats aside,

In your opinion in terms of versatitlity and the type of play Walcott is suited to, would you refer to him as a limited player?

This is not saying how good he is or isnt at what he does, just asking whether you would consider him limited?

Would you also consider him consistent in terms of regular or consistent good performances?

i thought walcott was a pace merchant only
in the last 18 months i have seen an improvement
he makes much more inteligent runs and his finishing has improved more than just on instinct
it would seem that if he is not scoring or assisting that he is a bit of a luxury but i think he brings pace into the team that is sometimes missing. he did rather well at that scoring and assisting thing last season and being as how that wins you games then i believe he has something to offer the squad.
there is also that fantastic record of nearly 4 goals per game when he podolski and giroud have been on the pitch together
surely an asset that is worth involvement at the club?

starmandb wrote:

Plymöuth Gööner wrote:LOL, look at us asking his opinion as if because he has the stats he knows all!!!

never put myself forward as a font of tactical knowledge i am just a fan
you asked me my opinion of when i believed walcott had played well and i offered it
i know it is objective and people see games differently

starmandb wrote:

Omphi93 wrote:Starman, stats aside,

In your opinion in terms of versatitlity and the type of play Walcott is suited to, would you refer to him as a limited player?

This is not saying how good he is or isnt at what he does, just asking whether you would consider him limited?

Would you also consider him consistent in terms of regular or consistent good performances?

i thought walcott was a pace merchant only
in the last 18 months i have seen an improvement
he makes much more inteligent runs and his finishing has improved more than just on instinct
it would seem that if he is not scoring or assisting that he is a bit of a luxury but i think he brings pace into the team that is sometimes missing. he did rather well at that scoring and assisting thing last season and being as how that wins you games then i believe he has something to offer the squad.
there is also that fantastic record of nearly 4 goals per game when he podolski and giroud have been on the pitch together
surely an asset that is worth involvement at the club?