Zedie wrote:theHotHead wrote:some of you are being a bit silly harping on about Mike Dean, how the hell was he supposed to see there was no real contact ???
And someone asked what the rule is for a foul. Touching a player is not a foul, football is a contact sport. There has to be contact befitting the reaction. the reaction was Son losing his feet and falling on the floor holding his ankle when AT BEST his foot was just brushed by Holding. There was absolutely not enough contact for Son to lose his feet and fall on the floor. There simply was not enough physical contact to warrant Son's reaction.
How can you give a penalty if you can't see contact?
That's why people are pissed off. Those cheating c*** profit from this sort of play time and time again and no one pulls them up on it.
Today Mike Dean has yet again enabled it.
Because he was conned by Son !!!! Its as simple as that. Son's reaction convinced the ref, you cannot blame the ref for that !!