http://www.eplindex.com/13838/bad-defen ... lysis.html
Would cut and paste everything from the article but there are multiple charts and I'm lazy so... click the link.
by RobinVanPerfect » Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:16 am
by Yorkyblue » Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:41 am
by GunnGunn » Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:52 am
by GSK_AFC » Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:58 am
by Trequartista » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:06 pm
Yorkyblue wrote:I could knock some stats together to make Cygan look better than Adams.
by Diaby24AFC » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:18 pm
by yosifun » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:04 pm
by Leody » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:46 pm
GunnGunn wrote:I agree with Yorky. From what i've seen of Santos he is great going forward but useless in defence, he commits himself way too much and for some reason always looks like he is treading water when tracking back.
I think there is a reason why AW played him on the wing on our tour.
by RobinVanPerfect » Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:07 pm
Yorkyblue wrote:I could knock some stats together to make Cygan look better than Adams.
by EvAMY-CRAIGLEEAFC » Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:23 am
by Massa » Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:12 am
by EvAMY-CRAIGLEEAFC » Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:18 am
Massa wrote:Why is when stats favour one of our players they're shit but if stats show our players are poor they're gospel
by Zedie » Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:25 am
EvAMY-CRAIGLEEAFC wrote:Massa wrote:Why is when stats favour one of our players they're shit but if stats show our players are poor they're gospel
I agree. I do not take notice of stats anyway. They mis-lead bigtime anyway. IE Completed passes. A player could have 90 odd per cent. But they could have been little square passes. Whereas a player could have attempted loads of 40 and 50 yard ones and got , Say 5 0r 6 of them out of 10. They look poorer in terms of stats. I judge a player on what i have seen.
by Fran Solo » Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:29 am
by Fran Solo » Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:29 am