UFGN wrote:EK there isn't going to be a replacement for the NHS
Im afraid your latest right wing wank fest, this time hankering after a private healthcare system, isn't going to happen
What I want is in house services within the NHS. Less private clinics, not more. Less private outsourcing of services full stop. Your attitude is, its already shit, so if you throw even more corporates into the mix what does it matter? Frankly your attitude stinks.
I don't want a race to the bottom.
f**k you're not that smart .... you just make up shit to support your myopic view ... it's beyond stupid
Nobody once mentioned a private NHS, or private clinics, or outsourcing services, the NHS would still be owned and operated by the state ... it's how it gets more funding that needs addressing ... only a complete idiot can't accept that fact
You're the sort of guy who hankers after 'the good old days' even though the truth is today's facilities, services, training, and care are ten times better ... bit like saying Highbury was better than the Emirates ... it wasn't, maybe the atmosphere was, but the stadium was a tired old piece of shit ...
It's pointless debating with you when you don't even have a rudimentary grasp of the subject under discussion ... all you can do is troll out your tried and trusted cliches even when they have zero relevance ...
Explain how you get from - moving away from a state funded pension / insurance culture to an individually funded insurance cover
to "right wing wank fest, this time hankering after a private healthcare system"
You just make yourself look an utter dick .... please, please stop
If you don't change the funding method how will you fix the NHS - let me guess the good old socialist money tree ... that fixes everything