by Royal Gooner » Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:36 pm
by Phil71 » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:01 pm
Royal Gooner wrote:I do have to say that Prorogation Ceremony had Bercow completely throw off any shred of neutrality which he claimed to profess.
by UFGN » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:10 pm
by Emeryates » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:11 pm
by Phil71 » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:12 pm
Emeryates wrote:Can't wait for Harman to be Speaker. A center to center left woman who some here want to degrade by calling Harperson. The right hate strong women
by Emeryates » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:14 pm
Phil71 wrote:Emeryates wrote:Can't wait for Harman to be Speaker. A center to center left woman who some here want to degrade by calling Harperson. The right hate strong women
Margaret Thatcher.
by Phil71 » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:14 pm
Emeryates wrote:Phil71 wrote:Emeryates wrote:Can't wait for Harman to be Speaker. A center to center left woman who some here want to degrade by calling Harperson. The right hate strong women
Margaret Thatcher.
And you won't see me calling her a ThatchPerson
by Sims » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:15 pm
Phil71 wrote:Emeryates wrote:Can't wait for Harman to be Speaker. A center to center left woman who some here want to degrade by calling Harperson. The right hate strong women
Margaret Thatcher.
by UFGN » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:32 pm
by DiamondGooner » Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:37 pm
Emeryates wrote:There's no real point debating with someone who makes up alternative facts. The reason Labour don't want a General Election is because Johnson can change the date to make No Deal happen
by Phil71 » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:51 am
by DiamondGooner » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:58 am
Phil71 wrote:High civil Court in Scotland rules that the current prorogation of Parliament is unlawful.
A panel of three judges at the Court of Session found in favour of a cross-party group of politicians who were challenging the prime minister's move.
In a summary of their findings, the Court of Session judges said they were unanimous in their belief that Mr Johnson was motivated by the "improper purpose of stymying Parliament".
They added: "The Court will accordingly make an Order declaring that the prime minister's advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect."
A spokesman for Number 10 said it was "disappointed" by the decision, and would appeal to the Supreme Court.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-49661855
by Phil71 » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:12 am
DiamondGooner wrote:Phil71 wrote:High civil Court in Scotland rules that the current prorogation of Parliament is unlawful.
A panel of three judges at the Court of Session found in favour of a cross-party group of politicians who were challenging the prime minister's move.
In a summary of their findings, the Court of Session judges said they were unanimous in their belief that Mr Johnson was motivated by the "improper purpose of stymying Parliament".
They added: "The Court will accordingly make an Order declaring that the prime minister's advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect."
A spokesman for Number 10 said it was "disappointed" by the decision, and would appeal to the Supreme Court.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-49661855
One question ..............
Can a Scottish Court over rule a Prime minister or an English Court?
What if the Con's go to an English Court and they decide it is lawful?
This is just stupid tbf, the Con's already looked into the legality and the Queen ascended it so how can it possibly be illegal ........... other than in some Scottish judges "opinion".
I'd be surprised if the Supreme Court doesn't just reverse it.
by Emeryates » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:33 am
by Emeryates » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:34 am