Héctor24 wrote:
16 year olds arent physically mature either thats a fact in the vast majority of cases.
......... admitting I'm right in other words.
Héctor24 wrote:this is irrelevant what does it relate too. The point of what i am saying is an argument can be made for someone who is 14 having sex. You wouldnt need to do that if they were already allowed. Being able to look after yourself isnt an enforced prerequisite for child bearing. Do you really think a 16 year old is any more likely to be able to look after a child than a 15 year old?
You were discussing being under the protective control of a parent, and that protection includes a sick bastard from having sex with their children without consent, I was giving examples of maturity to exclusively make decisions for yourself as an adult in comparison to when your a child, you are under the legal guardianship of a parent because you are too young to look after yourself hence why not having that consent is basically rape not to mention the above physical reasons already mentioned ...... another fact for you.
Héctor24 wrote:so you repeated exactly what i said when i said
Yet you called it a wives tale? I think your confused.
Héctor24 wrote:this is how i know you dont have a clue what you're talking about. You dont have a basic understanding of what that even says so you cannot argue based on it. If there are no recessive undesirable genes there's no chance of these so called genetic deformities unless there's some kind of mutation but that wouldnt be affected by who you slept with it's down purely to chance. They said it's a higher chance but they didnt say by how much it increase and also the likeliness of two sibbling sharing a damaging recessive gene. But again i'm sure you believe what you referenced equates to this.
Are you really that stupid? you've just answered it yourself yet your refusing to accept what it means.
There is more chance of bad genes being in both parents from the same family line, there are also different kinds of negatives that are passed i.e mental stability, Cancer, etc etc when two people have the same family traits because they are related that doubles the risk.
I never said you can't have healthy children but the FACTS show that if two people have the same negative trait then its likely to be passed on to the child, incest increases that risk FACT.
If one person has a cancer trait and the other has a depression trait the child may not inherit either but two family members will likely carry the same trait = Fact.
Héctor24 wrote:you're clearly not aware of the problems caused by an aging population and i cant be bothered to explain it in detail so il be quick
Don't bother I don't give a sh*t about your poor ass reason to hate Gay people, we're talking about your sympathy of paedophiles, lets stick to one of your sick in the head features at a time shall we?