ThereIsBearCüm wrote:No1Fan wrote:ThereIsBearCüm wrote:No1Fan wrote:ThereIsBearCüm wrote:I wouldn't.
well then that's up to you. It doesnt really effect you so obviously you wouldnt be expected to know the necessity of culling foxes that can indiscriminately take out all of a farmers chickens.
I bet if you're livelihood depended on it you would see things differently.
no difference between fox hunting and exterminating cockroaches imo
Nothing a fence won't fix.
FYI, my father in law's a farmer. I've worked on the farm and lived there for extended periods of time. I know exactly what it's like.
have you worked on every farm?
Have you?
no but im not trying to create a blanket rule for everyone. You are saying everyone can easily combat the danger of foxes and therefore fox hunting should be illegal like you are. I am saying fox hunting should be available to the people that need it.
Yours and your father inlaws experience does not apply to everyone
I think the new proposals state that you would need a license to do it so people cant legally wake up on a sunday morning and decide that they fancy hinting foxes.
I find it slightly hypocritical be some people that (not you specifically), that they're ok with people exterminating bugs and rodents, they're ok with people fishing without the purpose of eating the fish, they're ok with trapping and killing moles but when it's a fox suddenly the go up in arms about it.
As long as it is a wild animal that is not endangered i couldnt care less if someone else needs to kill them to better themselves. Who are people to say that the life of a fox is anymore valuable than the life of a fly.
Hunting with hounds is most painless way of killing foxes too.