CynicalGooner wrote:Leody wrote:Fact of the matter is, like it or not, because of decisions made by our predecessors long before most of us were born, American involvement in many areas of conflict helps to stabilize those regions today. If we were just to pack up and move home tomorrow things would not be stable in many regions of the globe. And I'm not just talking about Iraq and Afghanistan.
I could understand and sympathise with that argument if not for the fact that each new generation of American government, in fact almost every single president, gets you involved in a new conflict. That isn't just dealing with the consequences of predecessors actions
Fair point, but at least almost every case has been for no reason other than to stop tyrannical leaders from oppressing their people.
Gulf War 1 under Bush 1 - Sadam had invaded Kuwait. We liberated Kuwait and let Sadam go home.
Gulf War 2 under Bush 2 - Sadam was committing genocide against the Kurds in northern Iraq, but Bush cooked up a bullshit excuse when in my opinion that was enough of a reason to remove him. And then the whole war on terror thing.
And both World Wars we didn't want to get into, but you had the Lusitania and Pearl Harbor...
Vietnam and Korea were both "cold war" / "stop the spread of Communism" conflicts. Which in my opinion, while I don't feel it's any of our business, it is better for the average citizen of those said countries. There isn't a single example of any form of Communism giving the people a better life than what we have in the West under different forms of Democracy. But if you ask me, it's up to them to decide. Unfortunately though, the majority isn't always in favor of Communism, but they have no military power to fight their oppression.
And the whole war on terror thing. I'd rather have that going on in their house and not just sit here and wait for them to attack us and then do nothing about it. Because if we just left them alone over there and did nothing, the attacks on our country would continue. And I would much rather not have to live in fear. Kind of like going to school everyday and just hoping that the bully doesn't steal your lunch money, wouldn't it be better to do something about it? To me, that's the most justifiable reason to ever go into a conflict. Our country was outright attacked. Period. At least we had the balls to step up and do something about it.
You may not like what our country has done, but I'd wager that in most cases the populace of the countries we've gone to largely favors our involvement. Sure there will be cases where people don't, but for the most part, I'd imagine they are glad we got involved. The media for whatever reason loves to paint us as the bad guys, but Average Joe Iraqi is probably going to live a better life now that Sadam is gone. I do recall them dancing on the head of his statue... leads me to believe they probably didn't like him too much.
Trust me though CG, I'd seriously love to not be involved. And quite frankly it is against the Federal Government's Constitutional authority to do those things. The Federal Government doesn't even have the authority to tax the people, but that doesn't stop them. I'd like nothing more than to just be left alone and leave other people to their own business.
I hate our government as much as the next guy. But at least take the time to understand why things have been done and don't just blindly follow the masses and drink the media hate kool-aid.