by rogerthornhill » Wed May 12, 2010 1:07 am
by UFGN » Wed May 12, 2010 5:36 am
rogerthornhill wrote:Clegg's party lost seats and ended up with just 57 yet because the Tories need his support he ends up as DPM, if that's his idea of PR I don't think anything of it. The power that the Lib Dems have been given is completely out of proportion to their showing in the election.
by Reverend Gooner » Wed May 12, 2010 6:39 am
by CynicalGooner » Wed May 12, 2010 6:49 am
by SE13 » Wed May 12, 2010 7:11 am
by GunnGunn » Wed May 12, 2010 7:37 am
CynicalGooner wrote:Well done everyone for voting the slimiest, nastiest snake into number 1http://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&f=17&p=430435#0. Proper good job. Watch them systematically kill everything good achieved over the past 13 years (and don't believe the spin, Labour made massive strides). Only hope the Lib Dems can temper the flame a bit
They decided Cameron would win, just like they decided Obama would. What's the point in a free vote when everyone else does what they're told....
by TheLittleMozart » Wed May 12, 2010 8:07 am
SE13 wrote:I'm delighted. We have seen the back of Brown. He's gone, end of story.
A victory for common sense.
by whee » Wed May 12, 2010 8:17 am
by Galls » Wed May 12, 2010 8:39 am
CynicalGooner wrote:Well done everyone for voting the slimiest, nastiest snake into number 10. Proper good job. Watch them systematically kill everything good achieved over the past 13 years (and don't believe the spin, Labour made massive strides). Only hope the Lib Dems can temper the flame a bit
They decided Cameron would win, just like they decided Obama would. What's the point in a free vote when everyone else does what they're told....
by whee » Wed May 12, 2010 8:51 am
by rogerthornhill » Wed May 12, 2010 9:15 am
UFGN wrote:rogerthornhill wrote:Clegg's party lost seats and ended up with just 57 yet because the Tories need his support he ends up as DPM, if that's his idea of PR I don't think anything of it. The power that the Lib Dems have been given is completely out of proportion to their showing in the election.
You utter twit.
It is exactly what PR is needed. They actually got more votes than last time but ended up with less seats.
by UFGN » Wed May 12, 2010 9:36 am
rogerthornhill wrote:UFGN wrote:rogerthornhill wrote:Clegg's party lost seats and ended up with just 57 yet because the Tories need his support he ends up as DPM, if that's his idea of PR I don't think anything of it. The power that the Lib Dems have been given is completely out of proportion to their showing in the election.
You utter twit.
It is exactly what PR is needed. They actually got more votes than last time but ended up with less seats.
It's a pity that you have to resort to personal insults but coming from someone like you it's hardly a surprise. So why don't you enlighten everyone and tell us all precisely what is wrong with the electoral system?. Never mind the old complaints about how many votes it takes to return a Lib Dem MP, they are playing under the same rules as the Labour and Conservative parties. The Lib Dems finish second in many constituencies but why is that the fault of the electoral system? Others say that their supporters are concentrated in particular areas of the country, so why is geographical location of their supporters the fault of the electoral system?.
by whee » Wed May 12, 2010 9:36 am
rogerthornhill wrote:UFGN wrote:rogerthornhill wrote:Clegg's party lost seats and ended up with just 57 yet because the Tories need his support he ends up as DPM, if that's his idea of PR I don't think anything of it. The power that the Lib Dems have been given is completely out of proportion to their showing in the election.
You utter twit.
It is exactly what PR is needed. They actually got more votes than last time but ended up with less seats.
It's a pity that you have to resort to personal insults but coming from someone like you it's hardly a surprise. So why don't you enlighten everyone and tell us all precisely what is wrong with the electoral system?. Never mind the old complaints about how many votes it takes to return a Lib Dem MP, they are playing under the same rules as the Labour and Conservative parties. The Lib Dems finish second in many constituencies but why is that the fault of the electoral system? Others say that their supporters are concentrated in particular areas of the country, so why is geographical location of their supporters the fault of the electoral system?.
by Galls » Wed May 12, 2010 11:57 am
whee wrote:Well, fingers crossed for you Galls that Cameron keeps Cleggs fingers away from the NHS.
Clegg - "we're going to cut the numbers of administrational staff in the NHS and use that 2.5 billions pounds in the educational system!"
A whole 2.5 billion pounds, that'll make a difference to education. Not.
But it will f**k the NHS over royally.
by Forest » Wed May 12, 2010 12:01 pm