by She_Gunner_Wales » Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:52 am
It depends on the circumstances i think.
I do think that under the age of 16 consent is needed, if it were to be non-consentual then that would widen rights to other areas of medical consent, taking away parental responsibility.
If it were Kira when she was in her early teens, id be upset that she would not have felt she was able to come to me, but at the same time can understand how frightened a young girl would be to go to her parents, i dont think 15-16yr olds should be having children, its kids having kids, and at that age dont realise the huge responsibilty that comes with parenting. I know of one girl who's 21 who had a baby about 6mnth ago, even though she loves the baby to bits she also resents the child because she dont enjoy the freedom she once had.
please note: Im NOT saying they would make bad parents, often teenage girls who gets themselves pregant end up being single parents & that is hard going for an adult let alone a 'child', especailly when all her mates are either still at school & carefree or in the later teens out working & enjoying their freedom.
Its a big adjustment to life no matter how old you are, suddenly converstaions change from what you wearing out tonight & this & that lad, to what nappies you use or what time you was up feeding baby at daft o'clock.
I used to be anti-abortion but my views have changed alot.
This sort of debate can open a whole can of worms, there's for & against for so many different reasons.
Can be a very touchy subject.
Last edited by
She_Gunner_Wales on Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.