Jedi wrote:This is nothing like the Hunter laptop story, which was a coordinated censorship of the information across multiple platforms and lies by the govt to cover it up.
You can't get more coordinated than this. JD Vance is literally being bankrolled by Peter Thiel and Palantir, and Peter Thiel is inextricably tied to Elon Musk, both on a personal and financial level.
You have all these conspiracies, and you see collusion, corruption and rigging everywhere. But once it is the billionaires and special interest who massage your ego with their statements, your brain shuts off.
You're to talk about "big pharma" or defense contractors. But none of those companies even crack the top 50 in US. Yet you shill for the richest man in the history of humanity. You're pathetic.
jayramfootball wrote:In this instance, just from a simple search, it reveals you are lying again. It’s disgusting really that you would lie so blatantly.
Here’s why Twitter/X suspended the account
Ken Klippenstein was temporarily suspended for violating our rules on posting unredacted private personal information, specifically Sen. Vance's physical addresses and the majority of his Social Security number," the company posted.
Shame on you for peddling lies.
Your "simple search" terms appears to be "How do I shill for Elon Musk," because if you really cared, you could've at least included Ken Klippenstein's rebuttal to Elon Musk's shitty excuse.
The censored journalist, Ken Klippenstein, responded by pointing out that according to the document itself, all information inside of it was "readily available." Here's a quote from his substack:
The document itself describes its method of acquiring the so-called “private” information about Vance: "We undertook an examination of all readily available and relevant electronic and online records, several hundred Nexis and news articles, dozens of active and archived web pages, and several dozen public records from Nexis and the resources of various federal, state, and municipal government offices." In other words, everything was out there, either readily or for purchase.
So, unless the Trump campaign illegally spied on JD Vance, everything in the article is a matter of public record or purchasable from data brokers.
Furthermore, the report itself wasn't posted on Twitter. Klippenstein simply posted a link to his Substack, which means "X" is now banning people for off-platform behavior. Simply Orwellian.
And lastly, if JD Vance was some anonymous citizen, then I'd understand why his privacy is important. However, JD Vance is literally running for Vice President of the United States of America.
To censor a journalist reporting about him is SCANDALOUS, specifically because Elon Musk pretends to be a "free speech warrior," and literally mass unbanned devout Nazis by using that as an excuse.
So if he's a free speech warrior, I'd just like to ask, what law did Klippenstein break? Why is Elon censoring speech if it is not illegal? He doesn't mind all the racial slurs, Nazi flags, pro-Hitler comments, and so on. Why is this any different?
The only difference? He's doing a favor for his PayPal mafia buddy Peter Thiel.