by Losmeister » Sat May 28, 2022 10:27 pm
by Losmeister » Sat May 28, 2022 10:27 pm
Losmeister wrote:some of the outright fascism in this thread... so much for meoderators
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Sun May 29, 2022 3:11 pm
Losmeister wrote:some of the outright fascism in this thread... so much for meoderators
by DiamondGooner » Sun May 29, 2022 11:53 pm
by Royal Gooner » Mon May 30, 2022 1:07 pm
Losmeister wrote:Losmeister wrote:some of the outright fascism in this thread... so much for meoderators
oh yeah. i forgot "both sideism" is a thing
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Mon May 30, 2022 1:32 pm
DiamondGooner wrote:Have to agree, if you believe something is facist then name and shame, quote it and shoot it down with debate/ challenge it.
Moderators should only step in if someone is spouting outright hate speech or undeniable facism.
You can't have a politics thread if people are banned from talking politics, no one wing should get majority control on allowed speech unless it fits the description I stated above imo.
by UFGN » Mon May 30, 2022 2:15 pm
Royal Gooner wrote:Losmeister wrote:Losmeister wrote:some of the outright fascism in this thread... so much for meoderators
oh yeah. i forgot "both sideism" is a thing
If you want a civilised discussion, you have to hear the other side. Otherwise, you are living in an echo chamber.
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Mon May 30, 2022 7:40 pm
Your opinion might be worth a shit if you didn't regularly churn out low level racism and negative clichés like some Vanarama League 70s club comedian who wasn't funny in his hay day
by Losmeister » Mon May 30, 2022 8:11 pm
by Losmeister » Mon May 30, 2022 8:13 pm
DiamondGooner wrote:Have to agree, if you believe something is facist then name and shame, quote it and shoot it down with debate/ challenge it.
Moderators should only step in if someone is spouting outright hate speech or undeniable facism.
You can't have a politics thread if people are banned from talking politics, no one wing should get majority control on allowed speech unless it fits the description I stated above imo.
by UFGN » Mon May 30, 2022 9:36 pm
Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:Your opinion might be worth a shit if you didn't regularly churn out low level racism and negative clichés like some Vanarama League 70s club comedian who wasn't funny in his hay day
And just on cue...
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Tue May 31, 2022 12:28 pm
UFGN wrote:Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:Your opinion might be worth a shit if you didn't regularly churn out low level racism and negative clichés like some Vanarama League 70s club comedian who wasn't funny in his hay day
And just on cue...
You still sore that I called people who shoot animals for sport c****?
by UFGN » Tue May 31, 2022 1:13 pm
Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:UFGN wrote:Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:Your opinion might be worth a shit if you didn't regularly churn out low level racism and negative clichés like some Vanarama League 70s club comedian who wasn't funny in his hay day
And just on cue...
You still sore that I called people who shoot animals for sport c****?
Huh? I made the point that you don't really understand the issue not that you don't have the right to hold that rather bigoted and ignorant opinion. You do, but given you have no use for facts nor logic that becomes YOUR burden not mine.
That said if you would like to have a discussion about hunting we could present arguments on both sides in a civil manner right? That is my point about PC censorship being a way to avoid anything that challenges a belief. But you and most others that view everything from an emotional baseline rather than accepting facts and logic much less examining the results or consequences. So the argument becomes one of demonization of others. That is a point that would be lost on a member of Westboro Baptist Church, PETA or a radical Islamist...your way or the highway and when that fails to get the instant gratification required the only place left to go is hate. You seem to have more hate than love sadly, certainly no tolerance of others.
But your comment peaked my interest in why you hate hunters. So how do YOU differentiate between "sport hunting" and just plain old hunting and thus the innate part of human nature? Especially male (though not restricted to men) human nature where harvesting resources be it meat, fur, fish or fowl where by the act of hunting provides sport as well as resource gathering.
You might not understand that the goal is not to find glee in killing, that is reserved for kids torturing a lizard. Sport is a proxy for conflict and also when looked at in terms of hunting, a proxy activity that addresses the innate human trait I mentioned above. Now what I just did was ascribe my own sense of self as well as scientific research into the human being and what drives us. Is hunting essential in 2022 for survival? Nope, but it fills a need that many a man's soul requires. Do hunters demand everyone think as they do? Nope again. People are different and have different skills, interests and desires. As is it always has been. In times past the good hunters enjoyed it and were providers. Others were weavers or boat builders. That is why it is essential FOR folks to follow their souls and be what they are right? So why are people who hunt and enjoy it c**** exactly? Because it is something you don't have in your soul.
by Pat Rice in Short Shorts » Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:30 pm
by UFGN » Wed Jun 01, 2022 4:07 pm
Pat Rice in Short Shorts wrote:As I was saying...
You really do have a knack for validating my points. I'd say you are a metaphorical wolf trapper who keeps catching his own hand. Except most trappers don't keep on doing so.